neuber
04/24/2018, 7:31 PMbrainail
04/25/2018, 10:23 AMtest
channel but I think it’s can be more general problem.
When for instance I have more than 10 tests written with backticks then nothing works (via gradle too) with the following error:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Failed to transform class with name com.X.X.X.SenderTest. Reason: [source error] ) is missing
at org.powermock.core.classloader.MockClassLoader.loadMockClass(MockClassLoader.java:284)
at org.powermock.core.classloader.MockClassLoader.loadModifiedClass(MockClassLoader.java:192)
at org.powermock.core.classloader.DeferSupportingClassLoader.loadClass1(DeferSupportingClassLoader.java:77)
at org.powermock.core.classloader.DeferSupportingClassLoader.loadClass(DeferSupportingClassLoader.java:67)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:357)
at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:348)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.createDelegatorFromClassloader(JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.java:161)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.createDelegatorFromClassloader(JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.java:48)
at org.powermock.tests.utils.impl.AbstractTestSuiteChunkerImpl.createTestDelegators(AbstractTestSuiteChunkerImpl.java:108)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.<init>(JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.java:71)
Caused by: compile error: ) is missing
at javassist.compiler.Parser.parsePrimaryExpr(Parser.java:1250)
at javassist.compiler.Parser.parsePostfix(Parser.java:1031)
at javassist.compiler.Parser.parseCast(Parser.java:921)
at javassist.compiler.Parser.parseUnaryExpr(Parser.java:886)
brainail
04/25/2018, 10:24 AMAyden
04/26/2018, 9:39 AMadam-mcneilly
04/26/2018, 5:15 PMjakubgruber
04/26/2018, 8:00 PMDetected problems with app native libraries
(please consult log for detail):
libavcodec.so: text relocations
libswresample.so: text relocations
I do not use any native libraries. This happens on one screen on x86 device, so it's quite difficult to debug as I do not have one. I suspect Mobile Vision API or AWS SDK, but I use both in the latest versions.
I found that in Android 7, they stopped allowing developers to linking to native libraries and therefore they need to pack application with libraries included, but I cannot influence what my libraries use.
Any suggestions, please? :))rattleshirt
04/27/2018, 7:54 AMSkeletonDatabase.java:7: error: android.arch.persistence.room.RoomProcessor was unable to process this class because not all of its dependencies could be resolved. Check for compilation errors or a circular dependency with generated code.
in a module with AS 3.1.1, kotlin 1.2.40, gradlew 4.7, room 1.1.0-beta3, android gradle plugin 3.1.1? Already tried to downgrade versions but without any luck. It doesn’t look similar to the embeddable issue that was posted earlier.wilyarti
04/28/2018, 3:15 PMr-z
04/28/2018, 3:22 PMRavi.Rajjak
04/28/2018, 4:17 PMAna Stu
04/29/2018, 2:18 PMAndrea
04/30/2018, 9:01 AMAndrea
04/30/2018, 9:01 AMAndrea
04/30/2018, 9:09 AMAndrea
04/30/2018, 9:12 AMwilyarti
04/30/2018, 1:58 PMErfan
05/01/2018, 12:14 PMvolley
to my project in Android Studio 3.1.2?
I try with implementation 'com.android.volley:volley:1.1.0'
but it fails with the following errors:
Unable to resolve dependency for ':app@debug/compileClasspath': Could not resolve com.android.volley:volley:1.1.0.
Open File
Show Details
Unable to resolve dependency for ':app@debugAndroidTest/compileClasspath': Could not resolve com.android.volley:volley:1.1.0.
Open File
Show Details
Unable to resolve dependency for ':app@debugUnitTest/compileClasspath': Could not resolve com.android.volley:volley:1.1.0.
Open File
Show Details
Unable to resolve dependency for ':app@release/compileClasspath': Could not resolve com.android.volley:volley:1.1.0.
Open File
Show Details
Unable to resolve dependency for ':app@releaseUnitTest/compileClasspath': Could not resolve com.android.volley:volley:1.1.0.
Open File
Show Details
jakubgruber
05/02/2018, 7:26 AMSudhir Singh Khanger
05/02/2018, 7:40 AMprivate lateinit var movieAdapter: RecyclerView.Adapter<*>
private lateinit var movieAdapter: MovieAdapter
What is the difference between declaring type as the exact class of name MovieAdapter
and RecyclerView.Adapter<*>
? Also what does it mean by the asterix <*>
? Which one is better?Imran
05/02/2018, 5:27 PMImran
05/03/2018, 7:59 AMjw
05/03/2018, 7:45 PMorangy
05/03/2018, 8:05 PMjw
05/03/2018, 9:32 PMIf the name of the slack organization doesn't stop people from going off topic, I'm not convinced a channel name would either.and this conversation is evidence of that! (needs #meta)
ghosalmartin
05/04/2018, 10:30 AMneuber
05/04/2018, 12:20 PMJimmy Alvarez
05/04/2018, 8:28 PMSlackbot
05/05/2018, 5:46 PMDavor Maric
05/05/2018, 11:38 PMspierce7
05/06/2018, 2:55 AMspierce7
05/06/2018, 2:55 AMdrofwarcs
05/06/2018, 3:15 AMby
must also conform to the interface. If there was a similar kotlin feature like this that did not implement/conform the interface methods in the class using by
, I would be using this like crazy. The current way it works comes in handy for places where you would use the decorator pattern.pankajrai
05/06/2018, 4:12 AMtrevjones
05/06/2018, 4:19 AMFoo(...): DisposeBucket by DisposeBucket.Impl()
kenkyee
05/06/2018, 10:16 AMrkeazor
05/06/2018, 3:04 PMspierce7
05/06/2018, 7:26 PMrkeazor
05/06/2018, 11:52 PMlouiscad
05/08/2018, 8:04 AMspierce7
05/21/2018, 2:23 PMlouiscad
05/21/2018, 2:45 PM