Channels
#android
- k
kirillrakhman
10/01/2015, 10:18 AM@martynas please thumbs up the bug https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-9186👌 2 - a
antonioleiva
10/01/2015, 11:22 AMSilly question (I think I read something somewhere but can’t remember). Is there a workaround to access things like this?:ContactsContract.Contacts._ID - a
antonioleiva
10/01/2015, 11:23 AMas
is part of an interface that_ID
is implementing, it’s not accessible in KotlinContacts - d
desseim
10/01/2015, 12:06 PM@antonioleiva:
?BaseColumns._ID - a
antonioleiva
10/01/2015, 12:11 PMOh true, that was easy because
is public, but there are some others that are protected, such as:BaseColumnsContactsContract.Contacts.DISPLAY_NAME - d
desseim
10/01/2015, 12:11 PMand you want to access them in a subclass ? - a
alex.hart
10/01/2015, 12:12 PM - a
antonioleiva
10/01/2015, 12:16 PMyeah, that’s what I read, I looked in the wrong call for feedback. Thanks @alex.hart - m
mboudraa
10/01/2015, 12:24 PM@antonioleiva: I use java class to access protected static fields - a
antonioleiva
10/01/2015, 12:27 PMdo you have an example? - m
mboudraa
10/01/2015, 12:28 PM-.java - a
antonioleiva
10/01/2015, 12:39 PMAh ok, I understand now, you create a Java class and use it as a “bridge” to make them visible to Kotlin - a
antonioleiva
10/01/2015, 12:39 PMnice option too, thanks! - m
mboudraa
10/01/2015, 12:44 PMYou’re welcome. If you find a better option let me know👍 1 - k
kirillrakhman
10/01/2015, 12:56 PM@antonioleiva: Is this related to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/32016142/kotlin-accessing-constant-in-inner-class-from-java/32018754#32018754? - a
antonioleiva
10/01/2015, 12:56 PMyeah, the same - a
antonioleiva
10/01/2015, 12:57 PMwell, not exactly - a
antonioleiva
10/01/2015, 12:58 PMthis is not an inner clase, but an interface that it’s being implemented, which contains some static fields too - k
kirillrakhman
10/01/2015, 1:00 PM@antonioleiva: you cannot call
?BaseColumns._ID - m
martynas
10/01/2015, 1:04 PM@kirillrakhman: this https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-9186 is fixed in M15 - m
martynas
10/01/2015, 1:05 PMsorry, M14 - k
kirillrakhman
10/01/2015, 1:05 PMgreat - m
mboudraa
10/01/2015, 1:16 PM@kirillrakhman: this case you can, but sometimes static fields are protected - a
antonioleiva
10/01/2015, 1:26 PMyeah, that exact case was mentioned before - a
antonioleiva
10/01/2015, 1:27 PMIt’s not possible with
for instanceContactsContract.Contacts.DISPLAY_NAME - k
kirillrakhman
10/01/2015, 1:43 PMhm, https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-9186 doesn't seem to be fixed in the IDE - m
martynas
10/01/2015, 1:46 PMReally? I didn’t get any warning nor errors - m
martynas
10/01/2015, 1:46 PMwith custom views - k
kirillrakhman
10/01/2015, 1:47 PMduring compilation and in the IDE? - m
martynas
10/01/2015, 1:47 PMyes