Channels
#announcements
- c
Czar
12/04/2015, 8:35 AMIn that case the nature of the object you're passing decides the nullability of the interface simple smile If passing a
to your method does not make sense and shouldn't happen enforce it.null - v
voddan
12/04/2015, 8:39 AM@mzgreen: with
a real "java" field is exposed for injection etclateinit - v
voddan
12/04/2015, 8:39 AMand no overhead, I suppose - m
mzgreen
12/04/2015, 8:39 AMso if I would use Delegates.notNull() for injected field then it would not work? - v
voddan
12/04/2015, 8:45 AMthe field would be
and contain a strange object alafinal private
, to which the getter and the setter delegateDelegates.NotNull - v
voddan
12/04/2015, 8:47 AMI myself is still confused with
. Till recently it was thought that all "in kotlin" needs are covered by delegates. And than they madelateinit
, and said that it can be used not only for reflection :-//lateinit - m
mzgreen
12/04/2015, 8:57 AMthanks simple smile - d
dmcg
12/04/2015, 9:13 AM
is such a good reserved word, it keeps on cheering me up.fun👍 1 - r
rolgalan
12/04/2015, 9:13 AMloving extensions!! It works even for Java classes! ❤️ - d
dmcg
12/04/2015, 9:14 AMfun withFlags(vararg flags: Boolean, f: (BitSet) -> Unit)😀 2 - i
ilya.gorbunov
12/04/2015, 9:27 AMfun_with_flags.jpg - m
martynas
12/04/2015, 9:38 AMHuh? I’m already receiving notification about new available KT version. - m
martynas
12/04/2015, 9:38 AMOr is it just for AS plugin? - m
mzgreen
12/04/2015, 9:41 AMthere was a presentation at Polish GDG Fest 2015 titled
simple smilefun things(you: CanDo<in Kotlin>)simple smile 8 - e
Eugenio
12/04/2015, 10:30 AMyep I think it was from @mg6maciej, brilliant example of live coding 😉 - n
nickst
12/04/2015, 10:35 AMhow do i supply a callable for a timer schedule extension TimerTask.() -> Unit - m
mg6maciej
12/04/2015, 10:36 AM@Eugenio That was a title I coined at 2 or 3am when I couldn't sleep ;) - e
Eugenio
12/04/2015, 10:38 AM@mg6maciej: that's exactly how I produce my best work 😛 - n
nickst
12/04/2015, 10:39 AM? 😞 - e
Eugenio
12/04/2015, 10:41 AM@nickst: what do you mean exactly? - n
nickst
12/04/2015, 10:42 AMi see an extension for the Timer class that allow supplying a callable instead of a TimerTask object to run at the scheduled time but i can’t seem to understand the syntax to supply it - n
nickst
12/04/2015, 10:42 AMit is defined by TimerTask.() -> Unit - n
nickst
12/04/2015, 10:43 AMany clue? - m
mg6maciej
12/04/2015, 10:44 AMWhat's the function declaration? - n
nickst
12/04/2015, 10:46 AM - n
natpryce
12/04/2015, 10:48 AMPass the block after the function call. - n
natpryce
12/04/2015, 10:48 AME.g.timer.schedule(400) { println(“ticked!”) } - e
Eugenio
12/04/2015, 10:48 AMthen you would do something like:Copy codetimer.schedule(delay) { /* inside TimerTask */ } - e
Eugenio
12/04/2015, 10:48 AMheh yeah - n
natpryce
12/04/2015, 10:49 AMsnap!