http://git.io/vczVr is the abstract function. http://git.io/vczVg is the implementation. http://git.io/vczVj is the stack trace when the implementation is invoked (here http://git.io/vczw3)

@andrewoma: Now src and test in gradle (and maven too) are compiled as different modules because there are different tasks for compiling them. So internal classes from src are not visible from tests. But we understand the issue and will think what can we do. Thanks for reporting a problem!

@nastelaz Thanks for the update!

is there something equivalent to C#’s

using Foo=Example.Foo;

in kotlin?

like

import java.util.List as MyList

yes, exactly that syntax works in Kotlin

doh…

i should have tried 😄

Will the Kotlin plugin will have override equals like the Java plugin has? I need it for classes that can be data class (inheritance stuff).

yes, eventually it will. you’re welcome to file a feature request in the issue tracker

So, I get a fun exception when trying to use an abstract function. No idea why this is a thing. http://git.io/vczVr is the abstract function. http://git.io/vczVg is the implementation. http://git.io/vczVj is the stack trace when the implementation is invoked (here http://git.io/vczw3)

Am I doing something wrong or is it an issue with Kotlin?

it’s a bug in Kotlin

Well, that's good to know. Should I make an issue somewhere, or is it already known?

@jkcclemens: sorry, no time to look for dupes right now, so I’d appreciate it if you could file it to http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issues/KT

@yole: Can do.

It's now filed under KT-9428

quick reminder, does kotlin have the equivalent of the "pure" keyword to check for side effects caused by a method at compile time?

i don’t recall seeing anything like that.

menuId to (menuId != 0)

returns

(2131689474, false)

. WTF?

It is defined in the abstract class as

protected open val menuId: Int = 0

, but in the implementation class it is

override val menuId: Int = R.menu.timetable

. The call is from the abstract.

And it is in M13, can't test it on M14 since Anko doesn't compile.

looks crazy, can you reproduce it in isolated (non-android) environment?

sth like

val a = listOf(1, 2).map(String::init)

not yet

this is part of #C0AVAB92L work, and it is likely it will not be finished by 1.0, but it will definitely be done at some point after

I guess right now we'd better keep all the functions at the top level of the package, not in the objects that'd be cool if IDEA could open my package as a module, not as a directory

I heard

const

is so far only intended to be used together with annotations. I also started to use them as a replacement of Java's

static final

fields, but define them on file-level. Does this make sense, or are

const

totally not intended for this use-case?

if I remember right

const

is only available for string and numeric types.

string and primitive types:

const val int = 1
const val long = 1L
const val float = 1F
const val double = 1.2
const val string = "foo"
const val bool = false