i don't see any YouTracks about it

maybe file one for omitting the method altogether? at the very least i'd like to hear arguments for keeping it if it's intentional

may be too late, I'm afraid

actually, omitting it altogether may not be a good idea either: where would you place all the code? Annotations?

the code is inlined into the callsites

yeah, but it is also kept in the class

otherwise where would compiler get it, if you're inlining an already compiled method?

ah, good point. wasn't thinking of libraries.

How could code using a library containing an inline method ever use it if it's not even in the bytecode?

yeah, it has to be there in some way

maybe compiling it into methods with different names and then using @Metadata or some other annotation to specify that they have same name would work, but not removing it altogether

Indeed. That would remove the same-signature restriction

similar to how @JvmName works now, I guess

hi everyone

how to check if

val lazyProperty by lazy {}

is initialized?

with a flag

got it

but maybe you don't need

by lazy

after all. Take another look at your code 😉

Anybody knows where 1.0.2-1 release notes are?

Guys, I'm trying to use kotlin 1.0.3-eap-30 instead of 1.0.2, i tried to change the version number in my build.gradle, it didn't work (didn't find the version 1.0.3-eap-30)

ok, thanks

guys, I’m constantly getting this error:

com/android/tools/idea/rendering/AppResourceRepository
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/android/tools/idea/rendering/AppResourceRepository
	at org.jetbrains.android.inspections.klint.IntellijLintClient.getResourceVisibilityProvider(IntellijLintClient.java:739)

I’m using AS 2.3 preview 3

please update to Kotlin plugin 1.0.2-1

yep, I’m using:

1.0.2-1-release-IJ145-20

installed it some hours ago, and still getting the same exception

^^ @yan

let me know if I can help somehow

@robjperez: Version of 1.0.2-1 for Android Studio 2.2 was accidentally not published into the repository. We’re publish it very shortly.

oh, yes sorry, I said AS 2.3.. but it was AS 2.2…