Option 4

client.onMessage { (msg, sender) -> println("$sender: $msg") }

interesting option as well

@skneko I think it’s too hard to tell without seeing a larger context. Is there a family of operations you’re setting yourself up to compose? A sort of “algebra” of behaviors? If not, and this is just a simple handler block, I agree with @Ruckus

nah

only subscribing handlers to an event

yeah what ruckus said

Why is referencing varargs in a function using the name forbidden? eg

fun sample(vararg args: Any) {}
sample(args=1, 2, 3) // errors

Is it a technical limitation or a design choice?

I don’t think the grammar really has a good way to distinguish between one named param being passed in comma-separated and multiple parameters

if you really need that named argument, you could always do

args = *arrayOf(foo, bar, baz)

A question about inline classes: Do they support the same operators as their underlying primitive? Can I do myIntWrapper + myIntWrapper and/or myIntWrapper + 1, etc? If not, would this be an interesting feature?

No, and that's the whole point: it doesn't support things defined on the underlying type. There's

typealias

for that.

Can I add my own operators then?

Yes, and that's what the stdlib unsigned types are doing too.

Thank you, I think I understand

Is there a way to add a companion object to a third party class?

Unfortunately not.

Nope

hi, is there any milestone in utrack where you can view the 1.3 progress?

Thanks for the invite into here @edvin

Losing network connectivity, but will be back tonight

[edited] moved to tornadofx channel

My teacher showing how to write basic parallel code in c++ using a particular library demonstrates perfectly why I like Kotlin (because of all the boilerplate I could move into an

inline fun

if it were Kotlin). 😁

Well in c++ you wouldn't really need inline fun, you have macros, templates, and normal function that are inlined by the compiler anyway.

1.3 made into the dev repo.

Hello

repo.update(Catalogue::id eq it, childCatalogue?.copy(parentId = catalogue.parentId))

This is the function in question

How can I resolve this problem? I'm trying to make my class more testable. So I want to pass

val testService: TestService = TestServiceImpl(client)

into my

TestHandler

constructor. The problem is TestServiceImpl takes in a

client

and

client

is not really known until this line (line8) finished executing

val client = clientProviderInterfaceImpl.buildIoTClient(validatedResult)

@Hexa if you create a local

testService

, why do you need it at the class level?

so that I can mock the testService when I create

TestHandler

?

-.kt