I'm coming from iOS development and I'm having some issues with Fuel HTTP

it’ is possible use content provider with the new library Room

Damm I really can't find it. Might have been taken down?

@karelpeeters Is it this one? https://github.com/DemonWav/kotlin-utils Nice syntax, but beware it costs extra two objects per

using

block.

Inlining methods at compile-time isn’t always faster. The way hotspot handles certain things is pretty complex.

I am very surprised amazingscript is not a thing.

Any good tool recommended for Kotlin test coverage? Jacoco looks like not quite friendly for Kotlin.

i want to add

get

operator to my type and do something like this

array["a", true, null, 1]

Sure, but one might argue that

Person("Dave", age = 30)

is also resolvable at compile-time. Is there anything else that requires

const

?

That's indeed what it does on the JDK version, but the JS version doesn't work, looks like

Unit

is considered

null

there. The result if I run the code there is

a
error

why and when were commas deprecated (in

when

)? is it ok to keep using them?

does anyone know what would cause a squiggly underline under a pacakage name (folder actually exists) in a class that is specified fully qualified in code? (for example if I were creating a new object from a fully qualified class, e.g.

a.squiggly b.c.d.MyClass()

)

I'm getting the following warning, and I've tried googling without any luck:

[kts] kotlin.script.experimental.dependencies.DependenciesResolver.NoDependencies must have a constructor without required parameters

Do you mean exception in constructor?

To actually answer your question, if the parent constructor has at least one parameter you can use this trick to run whatever code you want:

super(param.also { ... })

What would people recommend for NLP/NLU in Kotlin?

any eta for kotlin 1.2?

is it possible to write react in kotlin?

Facebook Chatbot: vertx + java, vertx + scala or vertx + kotlin for a 10 years jee developer?

the issue here is the name

list

.

x

,

y

, or

foo

would be equally informative….

hmm, I’d probably autogenerate the field name as camelcase then

This article is about problems of automatic case mapping. Other is ok.

Let's stop with this nonsense. Either by explicitly declaring the mapping (choice 2) or by avoiding the mapping altogether (choice 3).

@nil2l he notifies that these annotations just a unnecessary thing, they make a data class less readable. When he need to modify data class, he should manage this field as well

hey guys, I'm having a problem here where when

myString == null

it matches both the

String?

and

Int?

types. Anyone know a way around this?

fun hello(myString: String?, myBoolean: Boolean) {}

fun hello(myInt: Int?, myBoolean: Boolean) {}

fun hi(myString: String?) {
    if (myString == null) {
        hello(myString, false) //overload resolution ambiguity
    } else {
        hello(myString, true) // this works fine
    }
}

Don’t allow myString and myInt to be null in the first place 😎

you're totally allowed to use a lot of the keywords in Kotlin outside of their normal context

This concept allows evolving language easier in the future. You can’t normally add another hard keyword without breaking some code. E.g. we added

suspend

in 1.1 without breaking any code that might be using

val suspend = shouldSuspendUser()

when would you return null for Unit?

is it ok to override a java default method (in the kotlin subclass interface of the java interface)? I ask because you can't call it via super so was wondering if there could be any unforseen consequences

val A.extVal get() = B(this)

Is there a way to not construct

B

every time I reference to

A.extVal

? Given that I don't own class

A

.