Dalinar
01/09/2019, 5:47 AMCzar
01/09/2019, 6:19 AM>>Deprecation cycle:<1.2: assigning one value element to vararg in named form compiles fine and is treated as assigning single element to array, causing non-obvious behavior when assigning array to vararg 1.2.X: deprecation warnings are reported on such assignments, users are suggested to switch to consecutive spread and array construction. 1.3.X: warnings are elevated to errors >= 1.4: change semantic of assigning single element to vararg, making assignment of array equivalent to the assignment of a spread of an array
narsereg
01/09/2019, 4:18 PMpoohbar
01/09/2019, 4:52 PMRuckus
01/09/2019, 4:55 PMprivate
(but it has to be top level)poohbar
01/09/2019, 4:55 PMSinan Gunes
02/04/2021, 10:22 AMtrove4j
?
I have this error:
FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.
* What went wrong:
A problem occurred configuring root project 'medici'.
> Could not resolve all artifacts for configuration ':classpath'.
> Could not find org.jetbrains.trove4j:trove4j:20160824.
Searched in the following locations:
- <https://dl.google.com/dl/android/maven2/org/jetbrains/trove4j/trove4j/20160824/trove4j-20160824.pom>
- <https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/jetbrains/trove4j/trove4j/20160824/trove4j-20160824.pom>
Required by:
project : > com.android.tools.build:gradle:4.1.2 > com.android.tools.build:builder:4.1.2 > com.android.tools:sdk-common:27.1.2
* Try:
Run with --stacktrace option to get the stack trace. Run with --info or --debug option to get more log output. Run with --scan to get full insights.
* Get more help at <https://help.gradle.org>
user
02/04/2021, 3:24 PMalfdev
02/04/2021, 4:59 PMuser
02/04/2021, 5:13 PMuser
02/04/2021, 5:13 PMuser
02/04/2021, 5:43 PMuser
02/04/2021, 5:55 PMPaolo
02/05/2021, 8:09 AMuser
02/05/2021, 3:37 PMcrummy
02/08/2021, 1:00 AMEugen Martynov
02/08/2021, 8:33 AMfun selectServiceNoThanksListItem() = adapterDelegateViewBinding<
SelectService.ListItem.NoThanks,
SelectService.ListItem,
ItemNoThanksBinding>(
viewBinding = { inflater, root -> ItemNoThanksBinding.inflate(inflater, root, false) }, ....
We have static function inflate that sits in the scope of the generated class. The class is generic parameter for this function. Would it be ever mechanism to not write this view binding lambda all the time just because we don’t have class information in runtime? Do you have own solution for this problem?user
02/08/2021, 5:01 PMuser
02/08/2021, 6:01 PMAnimesh Sahu
02/09/2021, 7:18 AMuser
02/09/2021, 3:40 PMViet Nguyen Tran
02/09/2021, 6:30 PMEugene
02/10/2021, 9:54 AMPhilipp Mayer
02/10/2021, 1:00 PMuser
02/10/2021, 4:05 PMThamilvanan
02/10/2021, 4:18 PMuser
02/10/2021, 6:34 PMahmad abas
02/11/2021, 12:07 PMahmad abas
02/11/2021, 12:07 PM