Channels
#announcements
- g
galex
05/24/2017, 5:10 PMThank you! - g
galex
05/24/2017, 5:10 PMSo everything static goes into companion objects ? - g
galex
05/24/2017, 5:12 PMSeems like it at least - k
kirillrakhman
05/24/2017, 5:13 PMor in top level - g
galex
05/24/2017, 5:13 PMWhat is the difference between naming the companion object or not? - k
kirillrakhman
05/24/2017, 5:13 PMyou mean
vscompanion object Foo
?companion object - g
galex
05/24/2017, 5:14 PMyes - k
kirillrakhman
05/24/2017, 5:15 PMvirtually none. you can refer to the
by name which is a rare case but when you do, it's either the name you gave it orcompanion object
if you gave it noneCompanion - g
galex
05/24/2017, 5:17 PMOk I see, thank you - m
mkodekar
05/24/2017, 5:50 PMWell the other day I was having the same question , but the question then went into irrelevancy⁉️ 1 - k
kirillrakhman
05/24/2017, 5:51 PMYou could ask the question on Stackoverflow, where you're mor likely to get an answer, plus it's documented for future help-seekersstackoverflow 1 - n
nick.salerni
05/24/2017, 6:53 PMHey @wjur ! 🙂 - d
deinspanjer
05/24/2017, 7:41 PMI’m getting a warning that all of the returns of this when test are being implicitly casted to Any. This doesn’t seem to be a problem to me, but what should I do about it? - p
pakoito
05/24/2017, 8:36 PMdoes anyone have experience with arrays + generics? - p
pakoito
05/24/2017, 8:36 PMinline and reified propagation has turned out to be a lot of fun - d
diesieben07
05/24/2017, 8:38 PMArrays and generics are a big pain... Best to stick with collections if you can at all avoid it. - p
pakoito
05/24/2017, 8:39 PMit’s the Array monad, I would gladly lift things to list and back down to array - p
pakoito
05/24/2017, 8:39 PMwhich is what I’m trying, except I can’t lower back to arrays again - p
pakoito
05/24/2017, 8:39 PMxD - d
diesieben07
05/24/2017, 8:40 PMyes, because arrays are not erased. List<String> and List<Object> are the same class. Array<String> and Array<Object> are different classes. - p
pakoito
05/24/2017, 8:41 PMso there’s no t there that would work, ever - p
pakoito
05/24/2017, 8:41 PMbecause an array of type B can’t be created - d
diesieben07
05/24/2017, 8:41 PMwell, you would have to pass around the class for the type in the array - d
diesieben07
05/24/2017, 8:41 PMthen you can reflectively construct the array instance - p
pakoito
05/24/2017, 8:41 PMI…I’d rather not - p
pakoito
05/24/2017, 8:41 PMit’s not that important - m
mg6maciej
05/24/2017, 8:49 PMWhy is
not working for you?list.toTypedArray() - d
diesieben07
05/24/2017, 8:50 PMI would guess because that requires a reified type. - j
juliocbcotta
05/24/2017, 9:16 PMis there an
toelse
?let