https://kotlinlang.org logo
Channels
Powered by
#announcements
  • x

    xdmeta

    12/27/2016, 7:09 AM
    r u talking about this? https://github.com/Kotlin/anko
    👍 1
  • x

    xdmeta

    12/27/2016, 7:09 AM
    den i have to explore
  • s

    stepango

    12/27/2016, 7:09 AM
  • r

    rwachol

    12/27/2016, 7:09 AM
    @xdmeta why dont you use android kotlin extensions?
  • x

    xdmeta

    12/27/2016, 7:11 AM
    ok @rwachol n @stepango thanx for your suggestions i'll explore this options 🙂
  • r

    rwachol

    12/27/2016, 7:11 AM
    (there’s also databinding by google)
  • x

    xdmeta

    12/27/2016, 7:12 AM
    alternative of butterknife?
  • r

    rwachol

    12/27/2016, 7:14 AM
    well, if you have databinding you dont need butterknife
    👍 3
  • x

    xdmeta

    12/27/2016, 7:14 AM
    oh ok
  • r

    rwachol

    12/27/2016, 7:15 AM
    it’s similar to jsp if you’ve ever done some java ee programming
  • x

    xdmeta

    12/27/2016, 7:15 AM
    yup i'm aware of it
  • j

    jan.rabe

    12/27/2016, 9:30 AM
    well there is also https://github.com/JakeWharton/kotterknife, although at this point i'll go with anko or kotlin android extensions, same as already mentioned
    👍 1
  • j

    jan.rabe

    12/27/2016, 9:32 AM
    i like that kotlin android extensions work for viewHolders out of the box
  • x

    xdmeta

    12/27/2016, 9:33 AM
    ok thnx i'll go through it 🙂
  • s

    sdeleuze

    12/27/2016, 12:03 PM
    Is it possible to compile Kotlin 1.0.x compatible bytecode with Kotlin 
    1.1-M04
    compiler ?
  • s

    sdeleuze

    12/27/2016, 12:04 PM
    Or is it the case by default if no Kotlin 1.1 specific feature is used?
  • u

    udalov

    12/27/2016, 12:59 PM
    if no 1.1 feature is used, 1.0.x bytecode is perfectly compatible with 1.1
    👍 1
  • u

    udalov

    12/27/2016, 1:00 PM
    you may also want to prevent yourself from using 1.1 features by specifying 
    -language-version 1.0
  • h

    hackerham

    12/27/2016, 1:03 PM
    @udalov kotlin-jackson kinda violates it 🙂
  • h

    hackerham

    12/27/2016, 1:04 PM
    but in the other direction - not every 1.0.x bytecode is compatible with 1.1 😞
  • u

    udalov

    12/27/2016, 1:04 PM
    that is not correct
  • u

    udalov

    12/27/2016, 1:05 PM
    if you’re talking about KT-14969, the problem is in the fact that the old reflection library (kotlin-reflect) is not compatible with the resources found in the new runtime library (kotlin-runtime)
  • u

    udalov

    12/27/2016, 1:05 PM
    it has nothing to do with bytecode and binary compatibility
  • h

    hackerham

    12/27/2016, 1:06 PM
    i think most of problems will appear in stdlib then )
  • u

    udalov

    12/27/2016, 1:06 PM
    a possible fix to that issue would be on our side, in kotlin-reflect sources
  • u

    udalov

    12/27/2016, 1:06 PM
    not in users’ bytecode
  • s

    sdeleuze

    12/27/2016, 1:10 PM
    @udalov Thanks !
  • s

    sdeleuze

    12/27/2016, 1:12 PM
    Should I continue to use 
    kotlin-reflect
    with 1.1 ?
  • s

    sdeleuze

    12/27/2016, 1:12 PM
    Asking that because you said "the old reflection library (kotlin-reflect)"
  • u

    udalov

    12/27/2016, 1:13 PM
    I meant the old (1.0) version of kotlin-reflect
1...784785786...3338Latest