kotlinlang #arrow-contributors

In case anyone wants to help with a CI task. We need to make sure we don't release again depending on non released versions of kotlin and the coroutines library https://github.com/arrow-kt/arrow/issues/1085

Leandro Borges Ferreira

11/06/2018, 11:45 AM

https://github.com/arrow-kt/arrow/pull/1087 line

raulraja

11/07/2018, 10:39 AM

https://twitter.com/arrow_kt/status/1060109608717615104?s=19

arrow 3

👏 7

👌 4

jereksel

11/09/2018, 1:18 PM

WE'VE DONE IT GUYS: https://www.reddit.com/r/programmingcirclejerk/comments/9vbie1/i_dont_think_the_learning_curve_for_kotlin_is_as/e9b2hee/

❤️ 2

Egor Trutenko

11/09/2018, 1:25 PM

dysfunctional programming

raulraja

11/09/2018, 10:26 PM

The Initial DRAFT of AQL is ready for Review. AQL (name TBD) is a query language based on SQL for type classes and data type. It's polymorphic and can work with the same syntax over spark datasets, in memory collections or pretty much any Kinded container that can hold data subject to be transformed, selected, filtered, grouped etc. https://github.com/arrow-kt/arrow/pull/1079

⭐ 1

simon.vergauwen

11/10/2018, 11:10 AM

Screen Shot 2018-11-10 at 12.09.47.png

simon.vergauwen

11/10/2018, 11:11 AM

Can we stop making master fail because of codecov? Or at least increase the margin to more than 0,01%?

simon.vergauwen

11/10/2018, 11:11 AM

Or is this a measure to increase codecov?

Jorge Castillo

11/10/2018, 5:15 PM

who configured this, @thanerian?

Jorge Castillo

11/10/2018, 5:15 PM

if we’re not taking a look to codecov ever I’d think on removing it

Jorge Castillo

11/10/2018, 5:16 PM

I’m not sure whether we’re really taking any testing decisions based on the codecov coverage atm

pakoito

11/10/2018, 5:23 PM

none at all on my side

pakoito

11/10/2018, 5:23 PM

it’s good as an external facing metric, but it doesn’t affect any perception I have of the codebase

simon.vergauwen

11/10/2018, 5:23 PM

Same here

raulraja

11/10/2018, 9:57 PM

Codecov currently lies in some places too

raulraja

11/10/2018, 9:57 PM

Like it would mark down coverage just adding stuff to README and other markdown files.

thanerian

11/11/2018, 12:51 AM

I could remove the integration, or at least don`t block the PR, just inform about it

Jorge Castillo

11/11/2018, 8:45 AM

It looks like we're "not using it" and I'd bet people out there is not paying much attention either. They would probably feel more confident about the library if they see a green check in

master

. Dont feel bad about this please, but I'd vote for removing, since I think it's just "noise" atm.

Jorge Castillo

11/11/2018, 8:46 AM

Also the CI pipeline is quite long already. Not sure if removing codecov will accelerate it but could come handy in that matter too.

raulraja

11/11/2018, 6:21 PM

@thanerian if it can just inform but not affect the red check that would be ideal.

raulraja

11/11/2018, 6:27 PM

https://github.com/arrow-kt/arrow/pull/1105

thanerian

11/11/2018, 6:40 PM

Ok i Will check that

👍 1

thanerian

11/11/2018, 10:06 PM

https://github.com/arrow-kt/arrow/pull/1108 created a condecov.yml file in order to avoid PR check status but still post coverage as comments

👍 2

raulraja

11/12/2018, 12:51 AM

PR to improve monad comprehensions boilerplate https://github.com/arrow-kt/arrow/pull/1109

🎉 2

raulraja

11/12/2018, 1:17 PM

https://github.com/arrow-kt/arrow/pull/1110

raulraja

11/13/2018, 5:57 PM

https://github.com/arrow-kt/arrow/pull/1119

😍 1

😮 1

simon.vergauwen

11/13/2018, 6:00 PM

Omg this is awesome 😱