Cool, thanks.

it's your library so it's ultimately your choice. it is a personal preference, but one of those that is a big pet peeve of mine

IAssertionPlant

versus

AssertionPlant

and

ICheckingAssertionPlant

versus

CheckingAssertionPlant

IAssertionPlant

is what i find myself starting to use for extension functions for assertions also another thing that i really like about the library is no

infix

functions

I think I get it

hint taken, I might need suggestions, per earlier I have Either<String, Data> where

Data

is a kotlin

data class

so my assertions were vs specific fields in my

Data

class

I’m trying to get startet with atrium, but when i add

assert(4 + 6).isLessThan(5)

to my code it does not offer to import anything and uses the assert(boolean) from the kotlin standard lib

also important: the test code should be easy to read, and it should be easy to find out what matchers are available and whats the best way do write an assertion

hmm do you publish source jars? idea usually downloads them but did not

what is your way of having a clean assertion of RxJava values? Do you use built-in assertions of TestObserver? Or something with atrium, like:

fun posts(): Single<Foo>...
...
test:

val answer = foo().test().values().first()

//assert answer with atrium

this

.test().values().first()

looks a bit verbose, do you wrap it into an extension function? Just curious what's the best practice here

I am happy to announce that 0.7.0 is out. Enjoy 😁 Please take note of the migration guide at the end of the release notes: https://github.com/robstoll/atrium/releases/tag/v0.7.0

we don't use a lot of atrium yet .. just in the process of migrating to it. will check out 0.7.0! thx 🙂

hmm i thought about that, but it definately does not suggest values after typing ignoringCase

I have a funny problem... I have the proper context in

isNotNull

(the IDE shows it), but

toBe

is resolved to

@kotlin.Deprecated public fun <T : java.math.BigDecimal> ch.tutteli.atrium.creating.Assert<T>

, so I get an error that my type is not derived from BigDecimal...?

right now idea suggests

ch.tutteli.atrium.verbs.assert.assert

and

ch.tutteli.atrium.verbs.assert

as autoimport for assert, the first of which is deprecated. is it possible to get a jar file that does not include the deprecated methods?

No, it's not a var...

hey Robert and all 👋. I had a really weird JVM fatal error when I run tests with gradle. I thought might be related with atrium. I updated JDK version and it is now gone. I am still not sure what is the root cause of the problem though 🙂

though I was wondering when working with this, does the IDE maintain code completion support for

::name

here?

Got any handy assertion functions for comparing JSON documents?

Is there a way to use contains with a list of nullables?

Is there some way to assert that a function does not throw?

Hi, I had a problem with atrium on gradle 5.0 it is related with dependency scopes probably because I had a similar problem with mockk also. Is it a known problem?

I would like to get some feedback concerning variable length argument lists. I am using the following pattern throughout the API for variable length argument lists:

first: T, vararg others: T

. For instance:

fun <E : Any, T : Iterable<E>> Assert<T>.contains(expected: E, vararg otherExpected: E)

The intention behind it: this way one has to pass at least one argument (compiler is not happy otherwise). I would like to know what you experienced so far: 1️⃣ it was helpful 2️⃣ it is confusing/makes things more complicated

Hi. I'm trying to use the library in a Multiplatform project . Currently I'm getting the following error in my js side:

Cannot access class 'ch.tutteli.atrium.domain.creating.throwable.thrown.ThrowableThrown.Builder'. Check your module classpath for missing or conflicting dependencies

I'm trying to use the 0.9.0-alpha version, my build.gradle.kts for test is quite simple:

js().compilations["test"].defaultSourceSet {
            dependencies {
                implementation( kotlin("test-js"))

                implementation("ch.tutteli.atrium:atrium-fluent-en_GB-js:${LibraryVersions.atrium_version}")

            }
        }

Do you have any idea what this might be? Thanks

Hey @robstoll, Have you ever considered to publish

atrium

to Maven Central repo? Any reasons not to?

Yes, I raised PR too

Think I've messed up my rebase/merge somehow, looks like it's doubled my commits? https://github.com/lukebiddell/atrium/commits/contributing-faq

ChronoLocalDate doesn't have an isAfterOrEquals fun Should I add a new function to ChronoLocalDate for it, or simply use

it.isAfter(expected) || it.isEqual(expected)

?

Hi, I'm new to Atrium (and Kotlin) so bear with me. I have a collection of objects and I want to make assertions on its content using some of the objects' properties. What I currently have is not readable. Is there a cleaner way?

data class Member(val name: String, val interest: String, val favoriteNumber: Int)
val members = listOf(Member("Me", "Kotlin", Random.nextInt()), Member("MyDog", "food", Random.nextInt()))
expect(members)
        .containsExactly(
                { feature { f(it::name) }.toBe("Me") ; feature { f(it::interest) }.toBe("Kotlin")},
                { feature { f(it::name) }.toBe("MyDog") ; feature { f(it::interest) }.toBe("food")}
        )

One question regarding collections,: In my project, the lists are quite large, is there a way to specify (for in order comparisons) to only show the wrong values so that you don't have to search the front x's through the whole list?

Hi @robstoll I was assigned this issue and just wanted to clarify what it might look like. https://github.com/robstoll/atrium/issues/81