Channels
#eap
- e
Eugenio
10/10/2016, 7:12 AM@sreich me too but I think 1.1-M2 is close - y
yole
10/10/2016, 8:14 AM@dmarcato we’d need some details - s
stepango
10/10/2016, 11:17 AM@dmarcato same for me, in tests with Mockito 2.2 will try to localize and share repo - v
vmironov
10/10/2016, 11:36 AMI have a feeling that
IDE plugin is much much slower than1.0.5-eap-38
used to be. Is there any instruction on how I should profile and report IDE-related performance issues?1.0.4 - y
yole
10/10/2016, 11:58 AM - a
aaverin
10/11/2016, 6:09 AMAnything about new kapt in 1.0.5 eap? - y
yole
10/11/2016, 9:16 AMyes, 1.0.5-eap-38 contains several fixes for the new kapt, all listed in the release notes - s
spierce7
10/11/2016, 9:09 PMHave there been any updates to the 1.1 EAP builds? It was created early August and I’m wondering if the 1.0.4 changes and 1.0.5 changes have found their way to the 1.1 builds yet👍 1 - v
vmironov
10/11/2016, 9:22 PM@yole: and here is the issue https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-14308 - s
stepango
10/12/2016, 2:26 AM@dmarcato just created test to reproduce bug you talking about, take a look at https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-14310 - d
dmarcato
10/12/2016, 6:21 AMthanks @stepango, that looks like my same issue 🙂 - y
yole
10/12/2016, 10:12 AM@spierce7 1.1-M2 will be released soon with all the new features from 1.0.4 and 1.0.5🙌 9 - k
kirillrakhman
10/12/2016, 10:46 AMAnd lambda destructuring 🎉 - y
yole
10/12/2016, 10:49 AMyes, and lambda destructuring🙌 2 - e
eddie
10/12/2016, 2:28 PM@yole I've been using the 1.1.0-dev builds with no issues so far, guess I've been lucky - y
yole
10/12/2016, 2:29 PMwell, we use them on the daily basis too, so they’re good enough at least for our work - e
eddie
10/12/2016, 2:33 PM@yole btw, what is the status of UAST? - e
eddie
10/12/2016, 2:33 PMis that specifically for frontend/IDE purposes or is that part of the plan to integrate with Google's Jack framework? - y
yole
10/12/2016, 2:34 PMUAST is specifically for IDE work. it’s not related to Jack or anything else - s
spierce7
10/12/2016, 3:19 PMWhat exactly is lambda destructurizing? - s
spierce7
10/12/2016, 3:19 PM*destructuring - k
kirillrakhman
10/12/2016, 3:20 PMlistOf(1 to 2).forEach { (a, b) -> /* do something with a and b */ } - k
kirillrakhman
10/12/2016, 3:21 PMnotice that the lambda parameter of
expects a single parameter of typeforEach
but using the syntaxPair<Int, Int>
, the parameter is immediately destructered(a, b) - s
spierce7
10/12/2016, 3:24 PMI see, cool - s
spierce7
10/12/2016, 3:27 PMI’m starting a new Android project soon that will consist of 3-4 months of development. My team is considering working on the 1.1 EAP for Coroutine support. Anything we should know while making that decision? - o
orangy
10/12/2016, 5:45 PMEverything is unstable, a lot of things may be broken:) Otherwise, you are all good:) - o
orangy
10/12/2016, 5:45 PMAnd yes, no backwards compatibility guarantees during EAP - s
spierce7
10/12/2016, 7:50 PMall expected. Thanks 🙂 - o
orangy
10/12/2016, 8:00 PMPlease share your experience with coroutines as you go. We have played with them here and there of course, but real-world use-case hands-on would be much better! - o
orangy
10/12/2016, 8:00 PMProbably better be done in #coroutines