Channels
#eap
- k
kirillrakhman
11/15/2016, 1:37 PMthe plugin from teamcity is compatible with IDEA 2016.3 right? - y
yole
11/15/2016, 1:37 PMit's built for 2016.2 - k
kirillrakhman
11/15/2016, 1:37 PMso no? - y
yole
11/15/2016, 1:38 PMwell, it will work but it could cause exceptions, and you'll definitely see mismatched icons - k
kirillrakhman
11/15/2016, 1:40 PMError:Could not find org.jetbrains.kotlinkotlin gradle plugin1.1.0-dev-4625. Searched in the following locations: https://jcenter.bintray.com/org/jetbrains/kotlin/kotlin-gradle-plugin/1.1.0-dev-4625/kotlin-gradle-plugin-1.1.0-dev-4625.pom https://jcenter.bintray.com/org/jetbrains/kotlin/kotlin-gradle-plugin/1.1.0-dev-4625/kotlin-gradle-plugin-1.1.0-dev-4625.jar https://dl.bintray.com/kotlin/kotlin-dev/org/jetbrains/kotlin/kotlin-gradle-plugin/1.1.0-dev-4625/kotlin-gradle-plugin-1.1.0-dev-4625.pom https://dl.bintray.com/kotlin/kotlin-dev/org/jetbrains/kotlin/kotlin-gradle-plugin/1.1.0-dev-4625/kotlin-gradle-plugin-1.1.0-dev-4625.jar Required by: project : artifacts still uploading? - d
denis.zharkov
11/15/2016, 1:42 PMYes, now they all should be uploaded Try again, please - k
kirillrakhman
11/15/2016, 1:43 PM - k
kirillrakhman
11/15/2016, 1:43 PMmaybe bintray needs a minute for processing - d
denis.zharkov
11/15/2016, 1:47 PMMust be fixed now - k
kirillrakhman
11/15/2016, 1:47 PMstill no luck - k
kirillrakhman
11/15/2016, 1:54 PMdoes the url https://dl.bintray.com/kotlin/kotlin-dev/org/jetbrains/kotlin/kotlin-gradle-plugin/1.1.0-dev-4625/kotlin-gradle-plugin-1.1.0-dev-4625.jar work for anyone? maybe it's my network - n
nhaarman
11/15/2016, 1:55 PMThe 4625 version does not appear in this list: https://dl.bintray.com/kotlin/kotlin-dev/org/jetbrains/kotlin/kotlin-gradle-plugin/ - k
kirillrakhman
11/15/2016, 1:56 PM - n
nhaarman
11/15/2016, 1:56 PMhttps://bintray.com/kotlin/kotlin-dev/kotlin/1.1.0-dev-4625#files/org/jetbrains/kotlin/kotlin-gradle-plugin does not contain a .jar file though - k
kirillrakhman
11/15/2016, 1:57 PMthat's what I noticed, too - d
denis.zharkov
11/15/2016, 2:13 PMPrevious deployment had failed because of network problems, so I started a new one - d
denis.zharkov
11/15/2016, 2:51 PM@kirillrakhman I hope by now everything has been uploaded successfully - k
kirillrakhman
11/15/2016, 2:53 PMyup, works now 👍 - k
kirillrakhman
11/15/2016, 2:54 PMnow we need an inspection for getter only properties with explicit type - d
denis.zharkov
11/15/2016, 2:56 PMI'm not sure about this inspection yet We don't have one for named functions, because in many cases explicit type helps readability But intention "Remove explicit type" already works - k
kirillrakhman
11/15/2016, 2:57 PMI agree, some precautions are necessary - k
kirillrakhman
11/15/2016, 2:58 PMIt's just that there are many codebases now, where people wrote lots of getter only properties with explicit types simply because they were forced to and now that they can migrate, it would be useful to do it automatically - k
kirillrakhman
11/15/2016, 2:59 PMat least that's how it is for me - d
denis.zharkov
11/15/2016, 3:00 PMI think it could be an option for code cleanup👍 1 - k
kirillrakhman
11/15/2016, 3:00 PMbtw, what about the KEEP regarding a special syntax for getter-only properties? - k
kirillrakhman
11/15/2016, 3:01 PMdid the no-special-syntax option win or could we see it implemented later? - d
denis.zharkov
11/15/2016, 3:03 PMAFAIK they will be discussed/implemented later (likely after 1.1) - k
kirillrakhman
11/15/2016, 3:04 PMon one hand, I like to get rid of explicit types sooner than later. on the other hand, a special syntax feels a tiny bit redundant now - d
denis.zharkov
11/15/2016, 3:05 PMBy special syntax you mean
?get() = 1 - k
kirillrakhman
11/15/2016, 3:06 PMno, by that I refer toval foo => 1