kirillrakhman
04/25/2017, 9:18 AMEugenio
04/25/2017, 9:31 AMorangy
Eugenio
04/25/2017, 9:40 AMorangy
Eugenio
04/25/2017, 9:41 AMEugenio
04/25/2017, 9:41 AMyole
04/25/2017, 9:45 AMyole
04/25/2017, 9:45 AMnhaarman
04/25/2017, 10:55 AMobject
inside an inner class. This is addressed in https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-16232, but it worked fine in 1.1.1. Is it known that this change is breaking, and is it intentional?nhaarman
04/25/2017, 10:55 AMprivate
yole
04/25/2017, 11:15 AMprivate
is not what matters here; the key thing is that such an object would have access to an outer class instance, which is conceptually impossible because an object is a singletonnhaarman
04/25/2017, 11:17 AMEugenio
04/25/2017, 11:38 AMnhaarman
04/25/2017, 2:04 PMyole
04/25/2017, 2:09 PMnhaarman
04/25/2017, 2:10 PMnhaarman
04/25/2017, 2:12 PMnitrog42
04/25/2017, 3:25 PMmesquka
04/26/2017, 2:19 PMjohn.shelley
04/26/2017, 6:15 PMmg6maciej
04/28/2017, 9:50 PMScreen Shot 2017-04-28 at 23.49.29.png▾
cedric
04/28/2017, 11:49 PMmg6maciej
04/29/2017, 12:00 AMmg6maciej
04/29/2017, 12:00 AMyole
04/29/2017, 7:07 AMmg6maciej
04/29/2017, 9:16 AMyoavst
04/29/2017, 10:30 AMmg6maciej
04/29/2017, 10:31 AMyoavst
04/29/2017, 10:32 AM