holgerbrandl09/11/2017, 3:06 PM
napperley09/13/2017, 12:45 AM
selckin09/13/2017, 9:00 PM
karelpeeters09/14/2017, 8:47 PM
files when I got to declaration.
diego-gomez-olvera09/20/2017, 10:08 AM
trevjones09/20/2017, 8:41 PM
tapchicoma09/21/2017, 7:19 AM
in IDEA? I've applied to gradle module
plugin and added
in dependencies, but no classes are generated after gradle sync.
Dalinar09/25/2017, 4:27 AM
kirillrakhman09/25/2017, 11:42 AM
? The benefit would be platform independence.
karelpeeters09/27/2017, 7:04 AM
bj009/30/2017, 3:54 PM
, and 1.1 is supposed to be the default right? I'm using 1.1.51
ziggy4209/30/2017, 4:30 PM
megamiun10/05/2017, 2:51 AM
gert.claeskens10/10/2017, 10:47 AM
Eugen Martynov10/10/2017, 9:44 PM
Kulwinder Singh10/11/2017, 2:42 AM
fitermay10/11/2017, 12:09 PM
barteks2x10/11/2017, 3:08 PM
christophsturm10/12/2017, 6:53 AM
Max Russek10/13/2017, 12:49 AM
, but in Java, it was a single intention action to move it to a static final field. Is there any equivalent for kotlin?
barteks2x10/13/2017, 8:49 PM
napperley10/17/2017, 3:46 AM
cleiter11/06/2017, 7:48 PM
holgerbrandl11/08/2017, 6:40 PM
Czar11/10/2017, 11:39 AM
richardsilveira11/13/2017, 7:08 PM
kz11/14/2017, 6:09 PM
bitmask can store. I like that the compiler just adds more `int`s instead of using something heavier weight (like arrays or
). But as I kept playing around I noticed that the compiler will generate bytecode that the JVM will not load. The easiest example is a function with more than 255 parameters (illegal by https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jvms/se8/html/jvms-4.html#jvms-4.11). Is there a valid reason for generating illegal bytecode. Or is the bytecode itself not illegal, it's just invalid?
beholder11/16/2017, 7:33 PM
bundled Kotlin plugin was updated to the version 1.2So, we can guess, what when final 2017.3 will be released, Kotlin 1.2 will go stable?