Channels
#intellij
- y
yole
10/07/2016, 1:01 PMthis is already there, if I understand what you need - y
yole
10/07/2016, 1:01 PMpress Alt-Enter on a parameter and use “Convert to receiver” option, or use the Change Signature refactoring and mark a parameter as receiver - n
natpryce
10/07/2016, 1:02 PME.g. in
be able to Alt-Enter on Thing and automatically convert the signature tofun myMethod(f: (Thing)->Result)
with all the call points inside myMethod fixed up. And the reverse: receiver to parameterfun myMethod(f: Thing.()->Result) - n
natpryce
10/07/2016, 1:03 PM@yole that only works on functions, not on functions received by functions - y
yole
10/07/2016, 1:03 PMright. issue please? - n
natpryce
10/07/2016, 1:04 PMWhere to I raise issues? Can someone pin the link to the channel? - y
yole
10/07/2016, 1:04 PM - n
natpryce
10/07/2016, 2:51 PMThanks - n
natpryce
10/07/2016, 2:52 PM@natpryce pinned a message to this channel. - n
natpryce
10/07/2016, 2:55 PMDo I raise under Kotlin or IntellJ? - n
natpryce
10/07/2016, 2:57 PMI’ve created https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-14245 - n
natpryce
10/07/2016, 3:00 PM - y
yole
10/07/2016, 3:09 PMthanks! - c
christophsturm
10/12/2016, 9:57 AMin my unit test i have a value like this:
. now i want to make it a field, and use the extract field refactoring. why does it only offer me a "property with getter" or a "lazy property"? i just want a normal field thats initialized at creationval primary = mock<BatchLogger>() - o
orangy
10/12/2016, 10:07 AMThere are (almost) no fields in Kotlin. - c
christophsturm
10/12/2016, 10:25 AMright,. i want a property without a getter that is initialized at creation - c
christophsturm
10/12/2016, 10:25 AMbasically what the extract field refactoring does in java - c
christophsturm
10/12/2016, 10:29 AMas a workaround i can just move the declaration from my method to the class level via copy paste - c
christophsturm
10/12/2016, 10:29 AMbut its unexpected - n
natpryce
10/12/2016, 10:31 PMmake it a private val and (I believe) the compiler will implement it as a field - n
natpryce
10/12/2016, 10:31 PMif you really want it to be a field, annotate it as@JvmField - n
natpryce
10/12/2016, 10:32 PMYou sometimes need to do this to make JUnit features work in Kotlin - c
christophsturm
10/13/2016, 8:49 AMi don’t want it as a field. i just want a simple property without a getter.val primary = mock<BatchLogger>() - c
christophsturm
10/13/2016, 8:52 AMi guess my initial question was misleading because i used field as synonym for property (i don’t make that distinction in kotlin) - k
kirillrakhman
10/18/2016, 11:56 AMhas anyeone else experienced problems with resources when running a gradle project from intellij? - e
ean5533
10/18/2016, 11:36 PM@ean5533 has left the channel - e
Eugenio
10/23/2016, 2:56 PMJB folks, any idea if/when semantic highlighting is coming to Kotlin? - o
orangy
10/23/2016, 2:59 PMWhat do you mean? - e
Eugenio
10/23/2016, 4:15 PMit's a new feature in IDEA 2016.3 - e
Eugenio
10/23/2016, 4:15 PM