After migration on

6.4.0

from

6.3.3

doesn't work following JS tests JS lib (target browser) -> MPP lib (jvm { target 1.8 }, js { browser {} }) If JS lib contains test, than:

Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
        at org.jetbrains.kotlin.gradle.targets.js.yarn.YarnImportedPackagesVersionResolver.updateVersionsMap(YarnImportedPackagesVersionResolver.kt:79)
        at org.jetbrains.kotlin.gradle.targets.js.yarn.YarnImportedPackagesVersionResolver.updatePackageJson(YarnImportedPackagesVersionResolver.kt:71)
        at org.jetbrains.kotlin.gradle.targets.js.yarn.YarnImportedPackagesVersionResolver.updatePackages(YarnImportedPackagesVersionResolver.kt:63)
        at org.jetbrains.kotlin.gradle.targets.js.yarn.YarnImportedPackagesVersionResolver.resolveAndUpdatePackages(YarnImportedPackagesVersionResolver.kt:29)
        at org.jetbrains.kotlin.gradle.targets.js.yarn.YarnWorkspaces.saveRootProjectWorkspacesPackageJson(YarnWorkspaces.kt:51)
        at org.jetbrains.kotlin.gradle.targets.js.yarn.YarnWorkspaces.resolveWorkspaces(YarnWorkspaces.kt:35)
        at org.jetbrains.kotlin.gradle.targets.js.yarn.YarnWorkspaces.resolveRootProject(YarnWorkspaces.kt:24)
        at org.jetbrains.kotlin.gradle.targets.js.yarn.Yarn.resolveRootProject(Yarn.kt:27)

Kotlin

1.3.50

I'm using gradle

5.3.1

and kodein

6.3.0

kotlin

1.3.40

i have an interface with i want to inject . i have bind it inside my

Application class

bind() from provider { MyInterface }

and when i use it inside my reposition NextRepository(prival val view:MyInterface) . I got the below error :

org.kodein.di.Kodein$NotFoundException: No binding found for bind<MyInterface>() with ?<MyMainClass>().? { ? }
    Registered in this Kodein container:

Inside my Main Class i have the following :

val view:MyInterface by instance()

What am i doing wrong ?

I have almost the same question than Kevin I'm using this for my retrofit instance

bind<MyService>() with singleton {
        instance<Retrofit>().create(MyService::class.java)
    }

and now I'm wondering if there's a way to avoid doing this

bind<LogniService>() with singleton {
        instance<Retrofit>().create(LoginService::class.java)
    }
bind<AuthenticationService>() with singleton {
        instance<Retrofit>().create(AuthenticationService::class.java)
    }
bind<DetailService>() with singleton {
        instance<Retrofit>().create(DetailService::class.java)
    }
---

Hi, how would be this with Kodein?

@Provides
    fun provideLoginApi(api: LoginRetrofitApi): LoginApi = api

Because this is the problems [1] that I'm having and I do not know if I'm missing something and I'm not injecting it well or what. [1] : https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58462982/http-method-annotation-is-required-retrofit2

hi hi sometime ago I created a [add-on library](https://github.com/arudiscord/kodein-jit-bindings) for Kodein that creates instances with reflection and I wanna ask if you guys would like me to PR this add-on to the main repository. the use of this library is to leverage ClassGraph/Reflections classpath scanning to instantiate classes using Kodein mappings.

This'll be hard to overcome.... https://developer.android.com/training/dependency-injection#choosing-right-di-tool

is there some common mistake that would cause me to see a

must not override an existing binding

error? I am seeing

Binding bind<MyRepository>() with ? { ? } must not override an existing binding.

, however there's only one place in a single kodein module where this binding is declared. is it possible I'm seeing this because this module is somehow being added twice?

Is there any way to create a module(kodein one) and put inside binds of different modules(android ones)? For instance, I have different modules(android ones) on my app, and when I was not using modules (android ones). An example would be : app module (android) inside I can have the DI of Presenter of one feature data module (android) inside I can have the DI of some repositoryImpl When I was not using modules(android ones) I was doing it in the same feature package, but now that I've split the things how can I manage it?

Hello fellow Kodeiners, A new version (6.5.0) of Kodein-DI has been plublished! You can find the changelog: https://github.com/Kodein-Framework/Kodein-DI/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md mainly, it contains: - Kotlin

1.3.61

- Multi-args factory deprecation, we now recommand to use

data class

instead, as one argument. checkout the documentation for examples https://kodein.org/Kodein-DI/?6.5/core#multi-argument-factories

Kodein update allows to reproduce Kotlin/MPP (or Kotlin/JS) bug. After update from

6.4.1

to

6.5.0

: 1. Kotlin see both versions. 2. Compilation broken - NPE on yarn dependency merge. Single known WA - remove Gradle caches.

Kotlin Conf

Nevermind 🙂 ... using version "6.4.0-dev+" and referring to the repository "https://dl.bintray.com/kodein-framework/kodein-dev" worked.

will Kodein ever have compile time dependency validation (like dagger)? is that even possible with this style of DI, since it's not all generated classes?

Hi! Does anyone faced issues with StandardScopeRegistry producing InvalidMutabilityException when used in Scopes?

Does anyone have a working example with kodein on iOS?

Hi! We’re implementing Kodein in our newest app at my company and we’re trying to abstract the dependency injection part (in case we need to suddenly change the DI library in the future) Has anyone ever done this ?

Hey, my team needs a Kodein tvOS target to develop a certain feature, is this feasible ? https://github.com/Kodein-Framework/Kodein-DI/issues/289

hey all, I'm hoping someone can help me with something here is there a way to access the binding tag from within the provider block? eg.:

bind<Retrofit.Builder>(tag = AuthType.OAUTH) with provider {
        Retrofit.Builder()
            .client(instance<OkHttpClient>(tag = /* How do I access the tag used above on provider line? */))
            .addConverterFactory(JsonConverterFactory())
    }

the use case here is that for some cases, the provider block might be many lines, and I don't want to have to repeat the code for each new

AuthType

, so I was wondering can I just pass that through, rather than repeat the code each time. is something like this possible?

Is there a way to disable automatic polymorphism support?

interface A
object B : A

fun main() {
	val dkodein = Kodein.direct {
		bind<B>() with instance(B)
	}

	println(dkodein.instance<A>()) // prints object B()   <--   this should not resolve!
}

overrides = null

and

overrides = false

are not documented. From testing, it looks like that •

true

requires an override •

false

disallows an override •

null

disallows an override So this doesn’t seem correct:

@param overrides Whether this bind **must**, **may** or **must not** override an existing binding.

I suggest using an enum here for clarity 🙂

Something I’m missing now and have to write on my own. A scoped builder 🙂

val kodein = Kodein.scoped(myScope) {
   bind() from singleton { context.createFoo() }
}

If there is already a way that would be great! If you think it’s worth adding I’ll open an issue.

It’s not possible to bind to

null

/ something nullable? 🤔

Also, given the provider above I’ve expected the following to retrieve the current instance every time I use the variable

authentication

. But it looks like that the result is cached in the delegate (

AuthenticationHolder.authentication

can change). Is there any way to tell the delegate to always ask for the current instance from the provider? I don’t want to use

.provider()

on the retrieval side to make it a function. That’s supposed to be transparent.

https://kodein.org/Kodein-DI/?6.5/android#_lifecycle_scope The documentation shows an example that does not compile 🤔 I want exactly one

ConversationPresenter

singleton per

ConversationActivity

instance.

val kodein by kodein()

can be nasty on Android if you forget to import the extension function 😄 https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-37796

Is there a plan to support

allInstances

for Javascript at some point?

val instances: List<Foo> = dkodein.allInstances() // not available in JS

If not, what are the limitations w/ Kotlin JS that prevent it? Also, is there a good recommended work-around to get similar functionality by using the container directly?

Does anyone know how to get an instance while in the Kodein builder context? I’ve tried finding the solution online, but can’t see anything in the docs. eg. The

configModule

has a

bind<Config>() with instance { Config(…) }

binding. I want to be able to use the instance of

Config

in the

databaseModule

which was set in the

configModule

.

val kodein = Kodein {
  import(configModule())
  import(databaseModule(instance())
}

The

instance()

has a compiler-level warning because it can’t use the

KodeinAware.instance()

function - is there a different function to use here? cc: @salomonbrys