Could someone have a look at my pending PRs when possible? Thanks

I’ve been reading the mixed-site variance paper recently, it’s very interesting. I haven’t written enough complex generic code with Kotlin yet to form an opinion - now that a lot of Kotlin code has been written, is the mixed-variance model in Kotlin generally considered a success? Does it achieve its goals of being a mix of simplicity and expressivity?

If no one working on https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-11097, I would like to start contributing Kotlin. I guess creating new inspection for data class resolve this issue, right?

By the way, is there steps to use build jar files in local machine? like local maven repo? I know there is jar files in "dist" directory.

@shiraji: maybe you could choose a different issue to work on? for this particular one, it’s not trivial to implement it so that it’s actually useful. (it’s easy just to add an arbitrary parameter to the data class, but it’s not really useful.)

when you’re working on an IDE feature, you don’t need to do anything manual with the jar files at all. just open the project and use the “IDEA” shared run configuration, it’ll run a new IntelliJ instance with your changes of the Kotlin plugin

Do you have any suggestion? I found there are a lots of issues related with inspection with “Up For Grabs” tag, so this issue may be good start of contribution. Ah! I thought there are only unit testing configuration. I only saw All_xxx configuration. Thanks a lot!

this one should be really useful and also relatively easy: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-9228

OK, I will take a look.

I don't want to push, but I have a couple PRs waiting for review 😜

yeah, sorry, will try to look at them today

no problem 👍

btw, I always feel bad asking for reviews on my PRs because I never know how the schedule of you guys looks like.

for example, I was confused that right after a number of my PRs got merged suddenly no PRs were processed but in hindsight it was obvioussly because 1.0.3 had feature freeze

https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-9271 is a weird one. For the receiver of extension functions,

KotlinQuickDocumentationProvider

is called with the whole function as

element

instead of the actual PSI element of the

this

identifier. Is it possible that there is a special logic somewhere that handles

this

differently than other elements?

Good time of day) I'am developing some LWJGL related stuff and https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-9009 getting annoying. So I started to investigate problem. Q1. How I should name bugfix branch?

How to run All IDEA Plugin Tests? I want to test intention. The error says Plugin "GitHub" was not loaded: required plugin "Git4Idea" not installed. I'm using IDEA with Git Integration and Github plugin.

@semoro I think you can name it whatever you like.

@shiraji: delete everything from

ideaSDK/config-idea

under the Kotlin checkout directory, this should help

@semoro: this will be a branch in your own fork of Kotlin, and we don’t care how you name it

Thanks. One of my machine still got the same result but at least the other machine works fine.

Hi everybody, I'm new here and I wanna develop some easy tasks. I'm experienced in Java programming. Would somebody help me and assign a easy Java task to me for start?

@toorajam: there are no “Java tasks” as such in the Kotlin project. even though we still have Java code in our repository, all new code is written in Kotlin

as easy tasks to start, you can look at the issues tagged with “Up For Grabs”: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issues/KT?q=%23%7BUp%20For%20Grabs%7D%20%23unresolved

Can I work on https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-12697 ? (which I’m not sure how to do it and what need to do it at this moment.) If there is higher priority one let me know.

@shiraji: sure, you can. that’s a fairly easy one

@yole thanks. by the way if there is space to you or any of JB guys, I sent PR https://github.com/JetBrains/kotlin/pull/892 Is KT-12697 like if caret is inside “: returnType” and user does "expand selection action", then select whole “: returnType”, right?

@shiraji: I reviewed your PR and answered in the comment.

I have a question about https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-12697. Does this issues include method parameter and field initialization?

foo(bar: <caret>Int) 
val foo: <caret>Boolean

How about null-able type? Currently, if user uses expand selection, it ignores ? mark

val text: S<caret>tring? = null

this becomes

val text: <select>String</select>? = null

Where

<select>String</select>

is the highlighted word. I think ? should be included. What about generics?

val text: F<caret>oo<Bar>? = null

This should be

val text<select>: Foo<Bar>?</select> = null

Is there sample test codes for word selection?

I think it should highlight the

Type

->

Type<T>

->

Type<T>?

->

: Type<T>?