kittinunf
01/18/2016, 5:26 PMkittinunf
01/18/2016, 5:26 PMyoavst
01/18/2016, 5:28 PMkittinunf
01/18/2016, 5:36 PMnull
?kittinunf
01/18/2016, 5:37 PMyoavst
01/18/2016, 5:55 PMyoavst
01/18/2016, 5:57 PMyoavst
01/18/2016, 6:01 PMresponseX
should return the same data as the async version, I'm fixing it now. Is Triple<Request, Response, T>
OK?kittinunf
01/18/2016, 6:08 PMResult<>
?yoavst
01/18/2016, 6:17 PMResult
because it throws the errorkittinunf
01/18/2016, 6:18 PMkittinunf
01/18/2016, 6:18 PMyoavst
01/18/2016, 6:19 PMyoavst
01/18/2016, 6:19 PMyoavst
01/18/2016, 7:14 PMresponseX
are now again regular methods so they could be called from Java.
I'll make the pull request.yoavst
01/20/2016, 4:13 PMkittinunf
01/20/2016, 4:14 PMkittinunf
01/20/2016, 4:19 PMyoavst
01/20/2016, 4:47 PMyoavst
01/21/2016, 2:52 PMkittinunf
01/21/2016, 2:54 PMyoavst
01/21/2016, 3:41 PMyoavst
01/21/2016, 3:41 PMRequest.promise()
is not needed any more simple smile Just task { request.responseX() }
mplatvoet
01/21/2016, 4:21 PMyoavst
01/21/2016, 4:39 PMkittinunf
01/21/2016, 4:40 PMkittinunf
01/21/2016, 4:40 PMkittinunf
01/21/2016, 4:42 PMyoavst
01/21/2016, 4:43 PMyoavst
01/21/2016, 4:44 PM