https://kotlinlang.org logo
Channels
Powered by
#spek
  • h

    hhariri

    02/26/2016, 9:13 AM
    @dmarcato: tnx
  • c

    cbeams

    03/04/2016, 12:09 PM
    What is the proper way to expect an exception in Spek? I see nothing in the docs about this, and it's not clear to me whether / how one can use JUnit facilities like 
    ExpectedException
    .
  • h

    hhariri

    03/04/2016, 12:31 PM
    @cbeams: assertFails { code causing exception } should work ok.
  • c

    cbeams

    03/04/2016, 12:34 PM
    Nice. That does in fact work.
  • c

    cbeams

    03/04/2016, 12:36 PM
    @hhariri: the following works as expected:
    Copy code
    assertFails({ myCode() })
  • c

    cbeams

    03/04/2016, 12:37 PM
    but I'm not sure what the syntax should be for the 
    assertFailsWith
    variant
  • c

    cbeams

    03/04/2016, 12:37 PM
    e.g.:
  • c

    cbeams

    03/04/2016, 12:37 PM
    Copy code
    assertFailsWith(IllegalArgumentException.class, { myCode() })
  • c

    cbeams

    03/04/2016, 12:38 PM
    results in a compilation error.
  • c

    cbeams

    03/04/2016, 12:38 PM
    I'm looking to invoke the 
    assertFailsWith
    this signature:
    Copy code
    fun <T : Throwable> assertFailsWith(exceptionClass: KClass<T>, block: () -> Unit):
  • h

    hhariri

    03/04/2016, 12:39 PM
    Should be IllegalArgEx::class no?
  • c

    cbeams

    03/04/2016, 12:39 PM
    (this is really a Kotlin language question, I realize, but while I'm here...
  • c

    cbeams

    03/04/2016, 12:39 PM
    thanks, was looking for class literal syntax, yeah.
  • j

    jkwatson

    03/04/2016, 3:09 PM
    @jkwatson has left the channel
  • b

    bamboo

    03/04/2016, 4:49 PM
    what’s the common spek / intellij solution to when you want to debug just one or few test cases?
  • h

    hhariri

    03/04/2016, 8:12 PM
    @bamboo: That’s currently a kind of a issue with Spek 😕
  • h

    hhariri

    03/06/2016, 7:57 AM
    <!here|@here> Laura Kogler has sent a PR to Spek that fixes quite a lot of the issues we’ve been having. But it requires also a change in the DSL, dropping the on. However it does provide support for nested describes. https://github.com/JetBrains/spek/pull/69
    👍 6
  • h

    hastebrot

    03/06/2016, 3:12 PM
    Yeah, this looks pretty good.
  • h

    hhariri

    03/06/2016, 4:32 PM
    There’s still the issue of running and navigating to individual tests.
  • b

    bamboo

    03/07/2016, 12:23 PM
    @hhariri: ok, thanks
  • i

    Ian

    03/10/2016, 3:54 PM
    Trying to add spek as a dependency in Gradle, but it seems to be missing from http://repository.jetbrains.com/all - specifically there is no http://repository.jetbrains.com/all/org/spek folder, which I think is where Spek should be
  • h

    hhariri

    03/10/2016, 3:55 PM
    @Ian: show me your Gradle dependency. Should be there…
  • i

    Ian

    03/10/2016, 4:00 PM
  • i

    Ian

    03/10/2016, 4:00 PM
    testCompile 'org.spekspek0.1.195'
  • i

    Ian

    03/10/2016, 4:01 PM
    (sorry for the delayed response @hhariri)
  • h

    hhariri

    03/10/2016, 4:06 PM
    @Ian: should be org.jetbrains.spekspek0.1.195 IIRC
  • i

    Ian

    03/10/2016, 4:09 PM
  • i

    Ian

    03/10/2016, 4:09 PM
    @hhariri: But that did work, so looks like the website needs to be updated
  • h

    hhariri

    03/10/2016, 4:11 PM
    Hmm. Will check it, thanks.
  • l

    lkogler

    03/10/2016, 6:09 PM
    Hi all, I'm working on a pull request for Spek, and I'm trying to figure out how to build/run the console runner. I don't see any executable file called 
    spek
    generated in any of my build outputs... what am I missing?
1...151617...112Latest