hoang
07/11/2016, 11:03 AMSpek
back then was an open class and have already have a runner annotation attachhoang
07/11/2016, 11:04 AM@RunWith(JUnitSpekRunner::class)
, I think, as shown here https://www.dropbox.com/s/enktl4rth4w7x1k/Screenshot_2016-07-11_18.04.26.png?dl=0hoang
07/11/2016, 11:07 AMraniejade
07/11/2016, 11:12 AM@RunWith(JUnitPlatform::class)
to get ide supporthoang
07/11/2016, 11:15 AM@RunWith()
upper in the hierarchy (as with Spek 1.0.25) so users doesn't have to annotate their test classes?raniejade
07/11/2016, 12:06 PMraniejade
07/11/2016, 12:09 PMhoang
07/11/2016, 12:37 PMhoang
07/11/2016, 12:37 PMraniejade
07/11/2016, 12:46 PMhoang
07/11/2016, 12:49 PMraniejade
07/11/2016, 12:51 PMhoang
07/11/2016, 12:52 PMraniejade
07/11/2016, 12:52 PMhoang
07/11/2016, 12:57 PMjasper
07/13/2016, 12:54 AMjasper
07/13/2016, 12:54 AMjasper
07/13/2016, 12:54 AMartem_zin
07/13/2016, 3:37 PMartem_zin
07/13/2016, 3:46 PMraniejade
07/13/2016, 4:23 PM@RunWith(JUnitPlatform::class)
. Will that work?artem_zin
07/13/2016, 4:41 PMhastebrot
07/14/2016, 9:01 AMany chances that 1.0 will be decoupled from JUnit5?Yeah, that would be nice. One should be able to choose between JUnit4, Junit5 and TestNG runner.
hhariri
christophsturm
07/14/2016, 9:45 AMapatrida
07/14/2016, 1:55 PM<http://repository.jetbrains.com>
? it seems unreliable and slows down gradle builds significantly even as the last repo in the listapatrida
07/14/2016, 2:04 PMapatrida
07/14/2016, 2:05 PMartem_zin
07/14/2016, 2:45 PMIan
07/14/2016, 3:05 PM