Channels
#tornadofx
- k
kastork
05/13/2017, 4:11 PMYaml maybe - k
kastork
05/13/2017, 4:11 PMor an embedded db - e
edvin
05/13/2017, 4:13 PM@kastork In that case, Use H2 🙂 - k
kastork
05/13/2017, 4:13 PMthat would be my first choice - k
kastork
05/13/2017, 4:14 PM@edvin I would, but the associated application is based on HSQL so I already need those drivers - e
edvin
05/13/2017, 4:14 PM@kastork That's good enough then. But for simple serialization, JSON is pretty easy to reason with. - e
edvin
05/13/2017, 4:15 PMWe actually have support for auto serialization to JSON. Never used it myself though, I like to write it out explicitly. - k
kastork
05/13/2017, 4:16 PM@edvin I've already experimented with your
, it works fineJsonModelAuto - e
edvin
05/13/2017, 4:16 PM@kastork Good to know 😁 - e
edvin
05/13/2017, 4:20 PM@kastork Look at the bottom of
. There are lots of helper functions so you don't have to do all this manually.Json.kt - e
edvin
05/13/2017, 4:21 PMFor exampleloadJsonArray(path) - e
edvin
05/13/2017, 4:21 PMOr even
if your domain object implements JsonModel.loadJsonModel - e
edvin
05/13/2017, 4:22 PMSorry, I see that's what you're using. - k
kastork
05/13/2017, 4:22 PMline 26 - e
edvin
05/13/2017, 4:22 PMYou just don't have a containing object, that's why you have the manual json tinkering code 🙂 - k
kastork
05/13/2017, 4:23 PMoh, so you're saying put the json array in a json object - e
edvin
05/13/2017, 4:23 PMYeah, but maybe you don't need to.. Why can't you just save/load
directly?modelConfigurations - e
edvin
05/13/2017, 4:23 PMIt's a list of JsonModel objects, right? - k
kastork
05/13/2017, 4:23 PMyes - k
kastork
05/13/2017, 4:24 PMone object per line you mean - k
kastork
05/13/2017, 4:24 PMno containing array - e
edvin
05/13/2017, 4:24 PMWhat kind of object is
?modelConfigurations - k
kastork
05/13/2017, 4:25 PMclass ModelConfiguration : JsonModelAuto {... - e
edvin
05/13/2017, 4:26 PMYou iterate over something called
(plural):modelConfigurationsmodelConfigurations.forEach.. - k
kastork
05/13/2017, 4:27 PMval modelConfigurations = mutableListOf<ModelConfiguration>().observable() - e
edvin
05/13/2017, 4:28 PMWhy don't you just do
then?modelConfigurations.toJSON().save(path) - k
kastork
05/13/2017, 4:29 PMI guess I never looked to see if
would know about JSON serializationmutableList - e
edvin
05/13/2017, 4:29 PMIt is of no consequence if the list is mutable or not, the
function is actually defined ontoJSON
🙂Iterable<JsonObject> - k
kastork
05/13/2017, 4:30 PMnice