Is it possible to implement this in type-safe CSS?

.paragraph-box:has-caret { -fx-background-color: #f2f9fc; }

I tried like this but it doesn't seem to work

companion object {
        private val paragraphBox by cssclass("paragraph-box")
    }
    init {
        paragraphBox {
            and("has-caret") {
                backgroundColor = multi(c("#f2f9fc"))
            }
        }

ah,

and(":has-caret")

works

or

val hasCaret by csspseudoclass("has-caret")

It's quite interesting to see how the mindset of an Angular developer is, compared to how we can think about data and views into the data as two completely separate concepts: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/44093417/tornadofx-controlling-tableview-row-object-while-build

@alexp11223 Nicely spotted -

csspseudoclass

is what you want for sure 🙂

It just struck me that the way you create anonymous inner classes in Kotlin is pretty confusing for Java developers. You might think that you don't need the

object

keyword to create an anonymous inner class, like this guy did. I can totally understand why he would think that: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/44093159/how-to-implement-tornadofx-webengine-callback-in-kotlin/

He didn't get much help from the IDE here either.

We're moving the code in the wild fly project out of the main github account to reflect its experimental nature. I'll post a link later today

oh. Encountered one third-party scroll pane (https://github.com/TomasMikula/Flowless/blob/master/src/main/java/org/fxmisc/flowless/VirtualizedScrollPane.java, used for RichTextFX code editor) that accepts

content

as constructor argument.

val codeArea = CodeArea()
        val scrollPane = VirtualizedScrollPane(codeArea)

So I cannot create a nice extension function similar to

scrollpane

. 😞 Is there any convenient workaround for this? Maybe someone already encountered something similar?

@alexp11223 - what extension function (i.e., similar to scrollpane) are you referring to?

the one that accepts

op

function as last parameter and so on. Which is used in

scrollpane {
    imageview("tornado.jpg")
}

@alexp11223 Can the content node be reassigned in the

VirtualizedScrollPane

?

This probably doesn't answer your question, but this is how I added the code area.

looks like no,

private final V content;

Just reworked the TornadoFx-Layer slide what do you guys think ?

@nimakro That looks beautiful!

@edvin Thank's I am not so sure about the colors yet. Did I miss anything important?

@alexp11223 You could cheat if you can live with having an extra stack pane in there.

@nimakro I don't think so. There are other pieces, but you have to draw the line somewhere.

@kastork commented on @nimakro’s file : You could consider titles for the blue and red boxes. Maybe Blue: "Services", Red: "Components"?

@kastork I had titles but removed them because I am not sure were to place them?

There's a view that displays this

ItemViewModel

. In that view I want to control the enabled state of things based on whether some directories/files have been created on disk. Is this a reasonable way to surface those conditions for the view?

@kastork Why do you need to find the ToolboxPreferencesModel every time? Could it not be injected into the ConfigurationModel?

Ahh..I finally managed to implement enough of RFC2617 so that the Rest client can now do preemptive digest auth. This prevents every other request from being a 401 response from the server. That's something I see all too often with digest auth. One tend to rely on always getting a 401 before using the accompanied challenge to generate the Authorization header.

@edvin it could... I think I put them there like that because of previous misconceptions re the relationship to the backing

Configuration

object.

@kastork OK. That's the only thing that comes to mind. Neat way of validating it btw 🙂

@edvin thanks for having a look

@kastork My pleasure.

buildable

and

ready

could also be booleanBindings, if you need to bind the result to anything.

Not sure why you would need to invalidate the other bindings, unless taking external changes into consideration.

@edvin yes that's why. The view exposes controls that cause the directories to be created and files copied in and so on