Channels
#tornadofx
- e
edvin
05/21/2017, 6:01 PM@kastork Sweet, then you thought about everything 🙂 😁 - k
kastork
05/21/2017, 6:02 PMtook too long to get to this point -- live and learn, however - e
edvin
05/21/2017, 6:02 PMYou could go crazy and use a file alteration monitor for that, and tie that to the bindings. But there is no technical gain to that 🙂 - e
edvin
05/21/2017, 6:02 PMForget I mentioned that 🙂✅ 1 - k
kastork
05/21/2017, 6:05 PMis this okay for such limited use (just an indicator)Copy codefieldset("Configuration Status") { label(viewModel.ready()) } - k
kastork
05/21/2017, 6:05 PMor is there a deeper advantage to converting
to aready
?BooleanBinding - e
edvin
05/21/2017, 6:07 PMI think you should always consider it if the value might change while the user is viewing the UI. - e
edvin
05/21/2017, 6:09 PMI tend to over-use bindings because then I never need to think about updating the UI, I just change state. I know mutating state really isn't very 2017 (if you ask the JavaScriptKiddies ™️ and functional people at least), but there is no way around that for a user interface. Might as well embrace it. - k
kastork
05/21/2017, 6:10 PMIn this case the only changes I'd anticipate would be ones done outside my control (like manual deletion from command line or Explorer or something). I guess that's the case for the file monitor - e
edvin
05/21/2017, 6:10 PM@carlw I have improved (hopefully) the digest auth a lot. There is a potential to run into a loop while performing an API call now, I need to guard against that so let me know if you run into something like that. - e
edvin
05/21/2017, 6:11 PM@kastork It might not be worth it. You could always go with a refresh button 😁😛 1 - e
edvin
05/21/2017, 6:16 PM@carlw The biggest change now is that subsequent requests will be faster. - c
carlw
05/21/2017, 7:57 PM@edvin I'm moving the project now. The new URL is https://github.com/bekwam/wafx - c
carlw
05/21/2017, 8:19 PM@edvin for the global events problem involving scope, i use separately-injected, scoped notification objects. There is a singleton app-scope notifications object and multiple scope-specific objects. - c
carlw
05/21/2017, 8:19 PMMaybe you can do something similar in the fire() method. Delegate to multiple eventbus objects? - c
carlw
05/21/2017, 8:21 PMIn my case, I'm not trying to this by inheritance (Component class) but rather getting the one or more notifications service objects that can publish to the write listeners. - e
edvin
05/21/2017, 8:24 PM@carlw We could introduce a
property to the event, so that it will only be published to subscribers in the same scope perhaps?local - e
edvin
05/21/2017, 8:25 PMHmm.. wait. I think we already have this. - c
carlw
05/21/2017, 8:25 PMi'd like to see that. in my design, I have the possibility of app-wide events and scoped events. i can't picture what prototype scope events would look like - c
carlw
05/21/2017, 8:26 PMand i think hierarchical scopes or something more complex than a single custom scope would be overkill - e
edvin
05/21/2017, 8:30 PMThe
class has aFXEvent
value, so if you expose this in the event subclass you can put the current scope into the event, and it should only be delivered to subscribers in that scope.scope - e
edvin
05/21/2017, 8:31 PMclass MyEvent(scope: Scope) : FXEvent(scope = scope) - c
carlw
05/21/2017, 8:35 PM@edvin did you test the new digest auth against WF 11? - e
edvin
05/21/2017, 8:39 PM@carlw No, just against 9, actually. - e
edvin
05/21/2017, 8:39 PM@carlw Did you try with 11? - c
carlw
05/21/2017, 8:39 PMyeah, i'm on WF11 and 10 - c
carlw
05/21/2017, 8:40 PMi'm getting some 401 HTML from the call but strangely a 200 status code - e
edvin
05/21/2017, 8:40 PMIn Wildfly 9, they basically just use RFC2069. - c
carlw
05/21/2017, 8:40 PMtext=<html><head><title>Error</title></head><body>401 - Unauthorized</body></html> - c
carlw
05/21/2017, 8:40 PMdoes the 401 status code get set if the auth fails?