Channels
#tornadofx
- n
nimakro
06/06/2017, 9:28 PMJust added a Issue so we don't forget what @kasrasadeghi suggested: https://github.com/edvin/tornadofx-guide/issues/29 If it is not clear feel free to update the Issue text 😉 - n
nimakro
06/06/2017, 9:29 PMOky I will have an early start tomorrow... night guys... - e
edvin
06/06/2017, 9:29 PMGood call 🙂 - e
edvin
06/06/2017, 9:29 PMSame here. Good night 🙂 - k
kasrasadeghi
06/07/2017, 10:25 PMAnyone alive here? - j
jchildress
06/07/2017, 10:26 PM🙂 it is quiet... you get used to how busy it is... seems lonely when it's not... - k
kasrasadeghi
06/07/2017, 10:27 PMI just asked on the other channels, but they seem to be empty - k
kasrasadeghi
06/07/2017, 10:27 PMto confirm, kotlin does not have an overloadable && operator, right? - j
jchildress
06/07/2017, 10:42 PMnot that I am aware of... I'm sure you have already seen this page: https://kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/operator-overloading.html - t
thomasnield
06/08/2017, 2:01 AM@kasrasadeghi I don't think so - t
thomasnield
06/08/2017, 2:01 AM - k
kasrasadeghi
06/08/2017, 2:01 AMYeah I've read the page. I'm just using infix 'and' - k
kasrasadeghi
06/08/2017, 2:05 AMThe IDE keeps telling me to add 'out' variance. I get concerned when the IDE is smarter than me. What is 'out' variance? - k
kasrasadeghi
06/08/2017, 2:06 AMI've read the Generics docs, but it still hasn't really clicked. - t
thomasnield
06/08/2017, 2:07 AM@kasrasadeghi it's Kotlins equivalent to Java's? super - t
thomasnield
06/08/2017, 2:07 AMI'm not good at generics either so I often just do what the IDEA tells me - k
kasrasadeghi
06/08/2017, 2:07 AMlol same - t
thomasnield
06/08/2017, 2:07 AMsorry, that is actually
equivalent? extends - t
thomasnield
06/08/2017, 2:07 AMlike I said, not good at generics - t
thomasnield
06/08/2017, 2:08 AMAlways saying to myself "producer extends, consumer super" - t
thomasnield
06/08/2017, 2:08 AMIn Kotlin, you might say " producer out, consumer in" - k
kasrasadeghi
06/08/2017, 2:09 AMso if it makes stuff for other functions, it's 'out' - k
kasrasadeghi
06/08/2017, 2:09 AMdoes that mean it's read safe or write safe? - t
thomasnield
06/08/2017, 2:09 AMTypically, yes. It increases the type flexiblity. - t
thomasnield
06/08/2017, 2:10 AMUsually write safe is the context it is used - k
kasrasadeghi
06/08/2017, 2:10 AMso if I had a List<out String> - t
thomasnield
06/08/2017, 2:10 AMI mean read, lol - k
kasrasadeghi
06/08/2017, 2:10 AMI could read Strings? - k
kasrasadeghi
06/08/2017, 2:11 AMSo if it's List<out String> - k
kasrasadeghi
06/08/2017, 2:11 AMit was made by a producer