I'll release once I'm done with the keyboard layout. There are a few bug fixes in that release as well.

Two weeks not here and bang find a bug😆

hmm, the smart resize policy doesn't like it, if i change the default font size on the table view

perhaps i'm doing it wrong?

@mikehearn I will set up a test and try to recreate.

@mikehearn I tested with two different tables with rather large font and didn't notice any issues. Are you able to create a small sample that shows the problem or perhaps tell me some more about how it fails?

maybe i'm not using the latest version, or i'm setting the font size wrong. i tried adjusting -fx-font-size inside .table-view {}

That's what I did as well, but there has been some bug fixes so try it with the latest release first perhaps 🙂

cool. thanks!

Np. Let me know how it goes 🙂

@Petros Paraskevopoulos has left the channel

@User uploaded a file:

Wow, nice :))

I just answered on this issue and I was a bit baffled by the requirements of the

CheckBoxTableCell.forTableColumn()

. Maybe my assumption is wrong, and that it doesn't require a

BooleanProperty

? Anybody knows? In any case, the comparison to type safe builder still tells me that they are the right choice for most situations. That's a lot of code and markup you no longer need to maintain 🙂 https://github.com/edvin/tornadofx/issues/363

Actually, the docs says that it should work for

ObservableProperty<Boolean>

, so I'm not sure why an old school property wouldn't work.

Weird, with the original/old property syntax and a programmatic cellvaluefactory, the value is still not updated when changed in the UI:

checked.setCellValueFactory { it.value.checkedProperty() }

It also doesn't work if I create the User.checkedProperty as

val checkedProperty = SimpleObjectProperty<Boolean>()

, so it has to do with the

ObjectProperty

not being supported by

CheckBoxTableCell.forTableColumn

somehow.

Hello! I have to ItemViewModels - ItemViewModel<Type1> and ItemViewModel<Type2> and i want to make a fragment, that displays data, that is a combination of both of them. What is the typical way to deal with that?

You would just inject them both, wouldn't you?

Do you have

Type1Model

and

Type2Model

?

@edvin Yeah, sure. I have Type1Model and Type2Model. Actually I asked the wrong question - the right one would be how to bind the item of Type1Model and item of Type2Model. I have several labels and the text in each of them is a method from first item applied to second item. And also I need a tableview, where the tablerows are the result of applying the method of first item to second. So what is the best way to make such labels and tableview?

Can you give a concrete example with minimal properties perhaps? I'm not grasping exactly what you want to do.

Your explanation is probably fine, I'm a bit tired today so my head isn't working right 🙂

@edvin ok 😉 ItemViewModel<WeekTimetable> and ItemViewModel<WeekWorkedSessions>. The first item is the timetable, the second are the working sessions. 1. There is method WeekTimetable.calcTotalMissedTime(s: WeekWorkedSessions). I need to see in the first label the amount of time, when the sessions did not correspond to timetable 2. WeekTimetable.calcMissedTime(val p: Person, s: WeekWorkedSessions) - calculate the missed time for a specific person. I need to output it in the tableview for each of the persons in the WeekTimetable.

If you inject them both in the same Fragment or View, won't you have all the information you need there?

@edvin yeah sure, I mean how can I bind the textProperty of the label to two properties of ItemViewModels?

That’s the actual question

So you want to create a binding that combines two observable values?

@edvin I also had a long day so probably I’m just a bit slow on the head right now)

Yeah 😉