https://kotlinlang.org logo
Channels
Powered by
#tornadofx
  • n

    nimakro

    07/18/2017, 8:10 PM
    Man I really need to ask my boss to pay me the trip to JavaOne I would really love to go there 😀
  • e

    edvin

    07/18/2017, 9:06 PM
    @nimakro Do it! See you there 🙂
  • n

    nimakro

    07/18/2017, 9:07 PM
    @edvin That would be awesome will see what he says 🙈
  • e

    edvin

    07/18/2017, 10:01 PM
    @permalmberg I'm beginning to see that. My via issue was solved in yesterday's nightly build it seems 🙂
    👍 1
  • m

    mp

    07/19/2017, 2:52 PM
    hello Does internal tornadofx rest client allow to call 
    post
    method with 
    form-data
    body? or only with json?
  • e

    edvin

    07/19/2017, 2:58 PM
    @mp You can use it for arbitrary http operations and set whatever payload and headers you want. It currently won't help you turn say a Map into form-data, but that wouldn't be hard to do, or even add to the framework 🙂
  • e

    edvin

    07/19/2017, 3:01 PM
    @mp It would look something like this:
  • e

    edvin

    07/19/2017, 3:01 PM
    @User uploaded a file: Untitled
    -.kt
  • e

    edvin

    07/19/2017, 3:01 PM
    This function returns the Response object, so you can read the text out of it with text() for example.
  • e

    edvin

    07/19/2017, 3:03 PM
    We could for example add a function like 
    api.formPost(path: String, payload: Map<String, String>)
  • e

    edvin

    07/19/2017, 3:07 PM
    A naive implementation could look something like:
  • e

    edvin

    07/19/2017, 3:07 PM
    @User uploaded a file: Untitled
    -.kt
  • e

    edvin

    07/19/2017, 3:07 PM
    (Unless I'm mistaken, long time since I've played with form encoding)
  • m

    mp

    07/19/2017, 3:13 PM
    will notify when will solve this. but for now - was obvious that content-type shouldn't be application/json in my case
  • e

    edvin

    07/19/2017, 3:37 PM
    @mp Great, you should have everything you need here 🙂
  • k

    kastork

    07/19/2017, 7:46 PM
    Am I just having a gross conceptual JavaFX misunderstanding here?
    Copy code
    tableview(runConfigurations) {
	runConfigTable = this

.....

vbox {
 visibleWhen(SimpleBooleanProperty(runConfigTable.selectionModel.selectedCells.count() > 0))
  • k

    kastork

    07/19/2017, 7:46 PM
    my 
    visibleWhen
    has no effect
  • c

    carlw

    07/19/2017, 8:12 PM
    i think it's because count() isn't a property that's re-evalutated. count() probably returns 0 at the start. You can test this by flipping the > to <=. If it's the reason I'm thinking of, you'll see it visible at all times.
  • k

    kastork

    07/19/2017, 8:20 PM
    that makes sense
  • c

    carlw

    07/19/2017, 8:33 PM
    just getting in front of a computer...looking for a count binding
  • e

    edvin

    07/19/2017, 8:36 PM
    Use a 
    booleanBinding
    to observe the 
    selectedCells
    list 🙂
  • e

    edvin

    07/19/2017, 8:38 PM
    visibleWhen(booleanBinding(runConfigTable.selectionModel.selectedCells) { isNotEmpty() } )
  • c

    carlw

    07/19/2017, 8:42 PM
    @kastork Use @edvin's example for the task at hand. This example highlights the difference mentioned in my previous comment
  • c

    carlw

    07/19/2017, 8:43 PM
  • c

    carlw

    07/19/2017, 8:44 PM
    I'm binding to a StringBinding "concat" rather than the concatentation of 2 strings. That is binding in turn to the StringBinding of asString. asString is built off of Bindings.size().
  • c

    carlw

    07/19/2017, 8:44 PM
    size() is a property unlike count(). The extra stuff is needed to go from a number -> string -> cat'd string
  • k

    kastork

    07/19/2017, 8:44 PM
    @edvin for some reason, I keep wanting to use the 
    SimpleBooleanBinding
    constructor instead of the factory method.
  • k

    kastork

    07/19/2017, 8:44 PM
    @carlw instructive example, thanks
  • c

    carlw

    07/19/2017, 8:46 PM
    @kastork yeah, if you can think in "binding" rather than java data structures, code like lines 19-22 will be easier than it looks initially
  • e

    edvin

    07/19/2017, 8:50 PM
    We could add a 
    countProperty
    to `ObservableList'. That would be handy!
1...129612971298...2007Latest