@edvin I just realized that there is a PSI-Viewer this is making things much easier 😀

@Ruckus You're right, there is still one failing

@nimakro What?? That's amazing news! I think our killer plugin feature, aka ViewEditor will much much easier to implement then!

@edvin Yeah you can activate the PsiViewer if you have at least on plugin module in your project. ..so if you open the tornadox plugin project you can go to Tools>PsiViewer and then you can see the complete Psi tree for what ever code you want, with the Psi classes and so on😀 😉 I will play with it some more this weekend 😬

@nimakro Fantastic! Maybe we'll finally get somewhere with the ViewEditor!

I'll do a release today.

Hot tip: If you declare a local object as private, you can access it's properties inside the class you create it in. That makes it perfect for creating ad hoc view models.

@User uploaded a file: Untitled

If you omit the

private

keyword, you won't be able to access the

ip

and

type

properties inside the viewmodel.

Why is that? Aren't

ip

and

type

public by default

So if you were to declare a local class it would work

Sure, but the point here is to avoid creating a specific class.

Anyone interested in a "biterator"? I created a boolean bit iterator for

byte

,

short

,

int

and

long

, was useful to debug my unsigned bytebuffer logic

@voddan Let me know if 1.7.9 fixed the delay 🙂

Looks like fieldset legends are broken in 1.7.9

I think it might have to do with https://github.com/edvin/tornadofx/pull/387

The reason is that the text value is added to the textProperty before the listener that actually adds the label when the text is changed, is attached.

Old declaration of textProperty:

@User uploaded a file: Untitled

New declaration:

@User uploaded a file: Untitled

The new assigns the value to the textProperty at once, so that this code from init no longer triggers the listener that adds the label:

That was a subtle one, @nimakro 🙂

@edvin Oh my sorry about that 🙈 I wonder why I didn't catch that we should probably add a test....

@edvin So do we have to do another release?

@nimakro I think we could test for this with TestFX actually. Maybe we should add a test for it? Not quite sure how to do it, but maybe we have some other samples we can look at.

@nimakro We'll wait for a little while, in case there is more.