setting it to CENTER_LEFT or CENTER has no effect on height

@wineluis uploaded a file:

@edvin do you think we can start doing 0.X releases for TornadoFX-ControlsFX?

@wineluis does it bring System 101 in line with the checkbox?

@wineluis there's a fixedCellSize property that you might try too. two CSS properties go along with this: -fx-cell-size and -fx-fixed-cell-size.

TIP FOR HIDING WINDOWS: This is straight-up JavaFX but I worked an interesting ticket. I had a Task wired up to a ProgressBar. I got a complaint that the save operation didn't seem to be "doing anything" and that the users were re-opening windows to make sure their button press took effect. So, instead of doing a plain hide(), I did the following Timeline timeline = new Timeline(new KeyFrame( Duration.millis(500), ae -> MyForm.this.getScene().getWindow().hide())); timeline.play(); That way, the operation delays and shows something in the bound ProgressBar and Label before closing. Without the Animation, the window closed and never showed the progress.

I have done something similar one time: When a file has been loaded successfully (while showing a progress), I set the progress to 100% and waited for a few millis. That way the user had the "feeling" that the complete file had been loaded...

too fast is not good for the users 😉

i know...when was the last time you heard a "the back end is too fast" complaint

@thomasnield Absolutely, let's do a release of tornadofx-controlsfx tonight 🙂

O'Reilly video series on Kotlin for Data Science is now up. TornadoFX has some examples too. https://www.safaribooksonline.com/library/view/from-data-science/9781491998205/

How can I do this with my own data(base)? I want to make a login form with some users I have in a database

@edvin I saw your last commit, where you replaced a when with an if. The reason why I choose for a when (if I was the one who put it there), is that a when is more safe than an if without braces. https://www.imperialviolet.org/2014/02/22/applebug.html

@tieskedh Let's add braces then 🙂 But it feels like when is the wrong tool in this case 🙂

I personally disagree, it's just a better syntaxis for if else, but I understand why you would say that

I feel like if this isn't a good use case for

if

, then Kotlin wouldn't need

if

at all 🙂

true

@thomasnield I didn't get to the release yesterday, and it seems today is blown as well. Will try tomorrow 🙂

@tieskedh You might be right, it would be one construct less to support 🙂 hehe..

But I think the if in kotlin should be used as the shorthand if in other languages.

@edvin asked a long time ago aboutit, but here is my PR about https://stackoverflow.com/a/38793639/3978241. this can break code, so see what you want to do with it

@tieskedh The only way this would break is if somebody actually passed

null

as a lambda parameter, right?

yes

op?.invoke(this)

always irked me. I like this 🙂

I think we'll merge it and just mention it specifically in the release readme. I don't really see why people would do that, I don't imagine this will bite anybody at all.

me to, but i like the

return rec.also(op)

more...

Yeah, that's neat 🙂

Merged 🙂

is there a way to reference fxml objects or even fxml-injected objects in view in a controller class?

How can I make a stylesheet to only have effect on a single view?