pike
02/27/2018, 4:24 AMpike
02/27/2018, 4:26 AMamanda.hinchman-dominguez
02/27/2018, 4:27 AMpike
02/27/2018, 4:27 AMamanda.hinchman-dominguez
02/27/2018, 4:30 AM.filter().apply()
methods, I find it works well for me 🙂pike
02/27/2018, 4:31 AMpike
02/27/2018, 4:32 AMpike
02/27/2018, 4:34 AMamanda.hinchman-dominguez
02/27/2018, 4:34 AMit.contains([whatever you're looking for])
, then if you find it, you can change the default value in apply, otherwise keep it the sameamanda.hinchman-dominguez
02/27/2018, 4:35 AMpike
02/27/2018, 4:38 AMpike
02/27/2018, 4:38 AMpike
02/27/2018, 4:38 AMpike
02/27/2018, 4:40 AMamanda.hinchman-dominguez
02/27/2018, 4:41 AM?
might be better served at it?.status.toString()
amanda.hinchman-dominguez
02/27/2018, 4:41 AMpike
02/27/2018, 4:41 AMpike
02/27/2018, 4:42 AMamanda.hinchman-dominguez
02/27/2018, 4:42 AMpike
02/27/2018, 4:42 AMpike
02/27/2018, 4:42 AMpike
02/27/2018, 4:43 AMpike
02/27/2018, 4:43 AMamanda.hinchman-dominguez
02/27/2018, 4:43 AMpike
02/27/2018, 4:43 AMpike
02/27/2018, 4:43 AMamanda.hinchman-dominguez
02/27/2018, 4:43 AMpike
02/27/2018, 4:43 AMpike
02/27/2018, 4:44 AM