carlw
02/27/2018, 6:17 PMcarlw
02/27/2018, 6:17 PMpoohbar
02/27/2018, 6:17 PMcarlw
02/27/2018, 6:19 PMcarlw
02/27/2018, 6:20 PMcarlw
02/27/2018, 6:22 PMpoohbar
02/27/2018, 6:23 PMgtnarg
02/27/2018, 6:23 PMcarlw
02/27/2018, 6:29 PMs1m0nw1
02/27/2018, 7:29 PMedvin
02/27/2018, 10:06 PMst_aeon
02/27/2018, 10:11 PMcarlw
02/27/2018, 10:26 PMcarlw
02/27/2018, 10:27 PMamanda.hinchman-dominguez
02/28/2018, 3:39 AMamanda.hinchman-dominguez
02/28/2018, 3:42 AMamanda.hinchman-dominguez
02/28/2018, 3:42 AMamanda.hinchman-dominguez
02/28/2018, 3:44 AMamanda.hinchman-dominguez
02/28/2018, 3:47 AMpike
02/28/2018, 4:35 AMedvin
02/28/2018, 7:05 AMedvin
02/28/2018, 7:07 AMpoohbar
02/28/2018, 1:29 PMrunAsync {
Thread.sleep(1000);
} ui {
// update first piece of UI
runAsync {
Thread.sleep(1000);
} ui {
// update second piece of UI
runAsync {
...
...
}
As you can see each additional update step would have to be nested deeper and deeper in the blocks. There surely must be a better way?carlw
02/28/2018, 1:41 PMcarlw
02/28/2018, 1:42 PMcarlw
02/28/2018, 1:43 PMpoohbar
02/28/2018, 1:43 PMcarlw
02/28/2018, 1:44 PMpoohbar
02/28/2018, 1:45 PMrunAsync .. ui ..
construct does not use coroutines?carlw
02/28/2018, 1:46 PM