Channels
#tornadofx
- p
pike
10/10/2018, 8:02 AM@edvin I was using it in a with(config) { } -- just had a brain fart that it wasn't actually doing a save there. - v
ValV
10/10/2018, 8:02 AMWhat is etornadofx book? Do you mean Gitbook of TornadoFX? - h
Hamza
10/10/2018, 8:02 AMyes, it was a typo - v
ValV
10/10/2018, 8:04 AMI think it's generated from TFX docs on Github, and you can see the names of heroes there in commits, I think - h
Hamza
10/10/2018, 8:04 AMah,good idea - e
edvin
10/10/2018, 8:11 AM@mikehearn That would be amazing! I have another week with this injection molding stuff and then the plan is to make TornadoFX support JDK11 - m
mikehearn
10/10/2018, 8:37 AMsweet - m
mikehearn
10/10/2018, 8:37 AMi'm sort of waiting on that to do my own upgrade. i think i'm ok because graviton works on java 10 - m
mikehearn
10/10/2018, 8:37 AMand i don't use the auto-completing combo box. but i'd like an auto completing combo box ... - m
mikehearn
10/10/2018, 8:37 AMthe main painful thing will be the separation of javafx and the javapackager. that will involve a bit of work to piece things back together. - k
kevinherron
10/10/2018, 5:50 PM@mikehearn openjdk doesn’t include javafx - c
carlw
10/10/2018, 6:37 PMIf you're going to stay on 8 and not go with oracle, I would switch to Open JDK / JFX. That way, if there's a security bug identified, you can update immediately. The Oracle -> Open switch might be trivial, but there could be some SCM, build, or deployment differences that you won't want to work through if you're under-the-gun - c
carlw
10/10/2018, 6:37 PMTLS 1.3 might be one of those. That might be available in a future 8 - d
danielmcq
10/10/2018, 8:49 PMInteresting news recently from MS regarding their plans for Windows Virtual Desktops via Azure. Maybe a few years off still but....any thoughts on how that would eventually affect cross platform desktop development using TornadoFX/Kotlin/JVM? No effect? Slight issues with distribution? Big problems? Thanks for any thoughts. - i
iari
10/11/2018, 5:55 PMI don't understand, how layouts really work in JavaFX - somehow I always end up with wone part of my layout growing too big, another way too small - a
abhinay
10/11/2018, 5:58 PM@iari Most Layout (except Group) take up the space of the container. - i
iari
10/11/2018, 5:58 PMwhat about the squeezebox? - i
iari
10/11/2018, 5:58 PMI always often up with trouble with the folds inside it - i
iari
10/11/2018, 5:59 PMeither the content inside the folds, or the folds will not expand to the border, or it will grow to infinity - a
abhinay
10/11/2018, 6:00 PMSqueezeBox is not a layout. Its a control. - i
iari
10/11/2018, 6:00 PMright now I made this little code editor which sits within some stuff - and horizontally it doesn't recah the border, but vertically it extends infinitely beyond the border of the box - i
iari
10/11/2018, 6:01 PMsorry, my fault for confusing the terminology ... - v
ValV
10/11/2018, 6:02 PMMaybe put
between your editor and its container?hbox - v
ValV
10/11/2018, 6:03 PMSome containers do not stretch children - i
iari
10/11/2018, 6:03 PMyep, there is an hbox - v
ValV
10/11/2018, 6:03 PMCheckmaxWidth - i
iari
10/11/2018, 6:03 PMthe fold contains an hbox, the hbox has a drawer and a fragment which contains the editor - a
abhinay
10/11/2018, 6:03 PMIs the editor a WebView? - i
iari
10/11/2018, 6:04 PMnope, the editor is no webview - i
iari
10/11/2018, 6:05 PM@ValV - i have not set maxWidth on the hbox - or anywhere for that matter ... how do I check it? do i have to disable it somehow?