The Java method I'm calling looks like this:

public <E> SignalRFuture<E> invoke(final Class<E> resultClass, final String method, Object... args) {

it's that resultClass that I'm having fun with

MMM, so problem is occuring in GSON. It's not matching the String.javaClass to a java string object.

what's the output supposed to be? you might need a typetoken

DOH

var qes = proxy.invoke(String().javaClass, QUERY_EXCHANGE_STATE, pair)

I need to create a string and then use javaClass.

working perfectly now. Not sure if that is the correct fix, but it is very happy. GSON clearly needs the object

I love Kotlin and Tornadofx

Something that LOOKED horrendous now looks compact and beautiful

...and is taking minutes to hours rather than days to weeks

is there a build for 2.0-RC?

@alex No, but you can check out the jdk10 branch and build yourself 🙂

Hi, I'm trying to make a TornadoFx app installable using FxLauncher (using gradle plugin), but the updating UI is stuck on "updating" with progress bar full, and my UI not showing up, even though it is fully local (using

file:///

based URI). Does anyone know what could be the cause?

No TornadoFX, but the Install4J commercial app uses Kotlin for its GUI ! https://www.ej-technologies.com/products/install4j/overview.html

TornadoFX or Swing/AWT/etc bindings?

Looks like Swing

@edvin, it sounds like @amanda.hinchman-dominguez, @Rob, @carldea are going to be working on tornadofx during the american thanksgiving holiday. Is there anything to work on for Java 11? Maybe we can replace "Black Friday" with "TornadoFX Day"?

hahaha I like it. May run some more application with the jdk for the break, and look into perhaps issues piling up on the repo?

might be time for a spring cleaning

@carlw @amanda.hinchman-dominguez @Rob @carldea That sounds fantastic! At this stage we just need people to identify issues with the jdk10 branch (which is now targeting jdk11/javafx 11). I haven't been able to get it to run myself yet actually, but it might be an issue on my end, I think @abhinay was successful. Trying to keep my head above water here, and desperately want to work on this, but things keeps getting in my way 😞

PRs for removing deprecated features are also most welcome.

the now-public APIs a good place to start?

Yeah. Just running the test apps within the project should make it clear what needs to be done. When they run OK we could target external apps. I have a few lined up that should be easy to port to java 11 at least

are there any compilation errors in jdk10?

@carlw to my knowledge, no it should be doing it cleanly now

Is there any overhead of creating multiclass files and extension functions? I've been looking at sources and still can't really adopt to such broad content in source files (N classes, M extension functions). Reminds me of C/C++, rather than Java/C#.

Also, what about documentation? As I see it right now, most of the code methods are undocumented, is it indented?

Do you mean longer compile times with multiclass source files? Runtime looks like the same as regular java...a .class for each class regardless of the number of .kt.