Ah, I see the problem

which is why I made it part of the builder signature

You could possibly use something like:

the

if(expanded==true) this.expandedPane=fold

@User uploaded a file: Untitled

can I give my honest opinion?

Of course

YUK

😉

😄

I like honest opinions. They help me come up with better ideas

I agree that is rather ugly

@User uploaded a file: Untitled and commented: What if we combined the two?

The end of the

fold

builder could use your same if statement, but you wouldn't need to pass in an extra value.

Or is this cleaner:

@User uploaded a file: Untitled

that is what I prefer

It does look better

and let the internals handle it

content is good as it signals that you can control the TitledPane that gets created

If we changed your if statement to

if(isExpanded==true) this.expandedPane=fold

, I believe both syntaxes would work.

expanded = true is good as it signals a state

True

Is

expanded

the best name for it, or would something like

current

or

currentFold

make more sense?

you are at that point in time adding a pane from the perspective of the developer it already is the currentPane or currentFold, so with

expanded=true

you are signaling "this here pane needs to be expanded"

Good point 🙂

(As the

fold

builder made clear, I'm not the best at naming things, so any help in that regard is appreciated)

contrary to you and edvin I am looking at this from the outside in, you two are looking at it from the inside out

different perspective

the kode for this is on github, I am writing a photo show program (as I have convinced myself that I need one)