Right. I should add proxy support there as well. Actually, I think proxying is already supported, since you can configure it via a JVM parameter.

Same goes for TornadoFX actually, so you could always use it with a proxy, but now it's more explicit and more dynamic.

hi guys, I am working on a couple of projects that may be interest you (hopefully :p)

glm (opengl math lib), kotlin-unsigned (for unsigned support), gli(texture lib), assimp (models loading), openvr & ovr binding

do some of these sounds interesting?

Interesting 🙂

I am looking for any potential sort of cooperation, since they absorb an incredible amount of time and effort

I'm unsure how TornadoFX would fit in with most of this though.

umh, ok

and why so many projects at the same time?

never mind 😉

for work, but not directly related

No no 🙂 I'm not dismissing anything, just need to understand what you mean.

Are you thinking that TornadoFX could provide better integration against these libraries?

let's say, I always tried to fight the lack of good libs on java (jvm) for graphic development

So for example for openvr, what can we do to improve this?

we do need those at work, although they don't really can value them

I don't know, I was thinking, maybe an user needs to display some geometric values/results

like the list of vertices/normals/whatever of a 3d model

I'm not sure that would require any changes to TornadoFX. I don't quite grasp what you're asking for.

I don't know yet, I was just probing if there is any possibility of any common interests

Absolutely 🙂 I think the most common use case for TornadoFX is business applications, but it might be just as well suited for game development and visualization apps, so I'm all for it.

@edvin thanks for the proxy addition. It works great. I needed it to trouble shoot some rest calls between client and server. I use the Charles program to debug and I needed to set the proxy on the TornadoFX client. Thanks.

@edvin I should know that already about IntelliJ 🙂 I love it, but sometimes...

@jchildress Thanks for letting me know 🙂 I didn't have an easy way to test the proxy support, so thank you 🙂 Any great/complex software will have some issue, all in all I think JetBrains does a pretty fantastic job.

@edvin Oh I love them... couldn't work without them 😉

Same here.

@elect Are a good set of Java bindings available for any of the kits you mentioned?

@edvin I think there is potential for using TornadoFX for game development. The ViewModel addresses the separation of screen state and session (records) state which i think is important to keeping track of what's going on in the screen.

@edvin For a game, you're logic would start to drift into the View for performance and algorithmic reasons. Ex, you might pack a bunch of data in with a Node rather than chat with other layers.