https://kotlinlang.org logo
Channels
Powered by
#tornadofx
  • t

    thomasnield

    12/02/2016, 5:31 PM
    "null"==null
  • t

    thomasnield

    12/02/2016, 5:31 PM
    Evaluates to false
  • c

    carlw

    12/02/2016, 5:32 PM
    that's expected though, null compared to anything is a no result
  • t

    thomasnield

    12/02/2016, 5:36 PM
    Yep, but my eyes missed it
  • t

    thomasnield

    12/02/2016, 5:38 PM
    @carlw let's see what @edvin says about that annotation stuff.
  • c

    carlw

    12/02/2016, 5:38 PM
    for the TableColumn, maybe something like TableColumn<Person, String> tcFirstName; tcFirstName.setCellValueProperty(new PropertyValueFactory<Person,String>("fn"))
  • c

    carlw

    12/02/2016, 5:38 PM
    gets expressed in TornadoFX as
  • c

    carlw

    12/02/2016, 5:39 PM
    val tcFirstName by fxid(propertyvaluefactory("fn"))
  • c

    carlw

    12/02/2016, 5:39 PM
    I don't think you want to graft an annotation scheme on controls, kotlin or otherwise
  • t

    thomasnield

    12/02/2016, 5:42 PM
    Hmm...
  • t

    thomasnield

    12/02/2016, 5:43 PM
    That looks interesting.
  • t

    thomasnield

    12/02/2016, 5:43 PM
    I do agree on annotations. I personally don't like them
  • c

    carlw

    12/02/2016, 5:45 PM
    Other kits have annotations to support a light coupling with a WYSIWYG (FXML, IBAction, etc)
  • c

    carlw

    12/02/2016, 5:46 PM
    But i think this is probably best to channel into the builders (ex, tablecolumn( propertyvaluefactory) )
  • e

    edvin

    12/02/2016, 6:36 PM
    @thomasnield: I don't follow.. we already support var/val with the column builders. I know you know, so sorry for beeing sense again, but can you elaborate on what he wants?
  • e

    edvin

    12/02/2016, 6:37 PM
    @carlw Tony's my hero :) Hehe
  • e

    edvin

    12/02/2016, 6:47 PM
    @thomasnield Do you want to define something like 
    @FXProperty var name: String
    and have it turn into getters/setters delegated to a generated 
    nameProperty
    ?
  • j

    jchildress

    12/02/2016, 6:52 PM
    Can anyone get to the guide? https://edvin.gitbooks.io/tornadofx-guide/content/ stopped working for me all of a sudden....
  • e

    edvin

    12/02/2016, 6:53 PM
    @jchildress It works for me 🙂
  • j

    jchildress

    12/02/2016, 6:53 PM
    @edvin thank you, must be something on my side
  • e

    edvin

    12/02/2016, 6:53 PM
    @jchildress I can get you a PDF in the mean time? 🙂
  • j

    jchildress

    12/02/2016, 6:53 PM
    @edvin I think I have one from a while back.. i was working/reading the OSGI chapter
  • e

    edvin

    12/02/2016, 6:54 PM
    @User uploaded a file: tornadofx-guide.pdf
  • j

    jchildress

    12/02/2016, 6:54 PM
    I don't think anything has changed in the last week?
  • j

    jchildress

    12/02/2016, 6:54 PM
    @edvin Thanks 🙂
  • e

    edvin

    12/02/2016, 6:54 PM
    Thomas made some changes today. This one is up to date.
  • c

    carlw

    12/02/2016, 7:21 PM
    The new parameter hints feature in 2016.3 caught its first bug for me. Had 2 String arguments switched around
  • e

    edvin

    12/02/2016, 7:23 PM
    Nice 🙂
  • e

    edvin

    12/02/2016, 7:44 PM
    @thomasnield I want to document scopes in the guide this weekend. Where do you think it fits best? It is related to 
    inject
    at least, but I'm not sure where it would fit most naturally.
  • t

    thomasnield

    12/02/2016, 8:05 PM
    @edvin maybe that warrants a whole chapter? Perhaps towards the end since its somewhat advanced? We could also give it an appendix section if it's not that huge and mention it from that Components chapter
1...617618619...2007Latest