@carlw I like it!

BTW @edvin there's also an opportunity to build a control on top of the service (navbar, etc). Maybe a typesafe builder "navbar()"?

That's right.. I wanted a control for either the Slideshow and/or the Wizard as well..

Gotta run, again 🙂

you give the examples with fragments, but as you are using find, it should work with views too?

the param I mean

@ron It works with Views as well 🙂

ok I am trying to get the same functionality as plusassign into a fold

Brb

btw I want to add this to tornadofx:

@User uploaded a file: Untitled

Gosh you guys have been so busy, I need to catch up on so much stuff.

grins I gave up trying to catch up

often I just spend an hour reading back the channel, picking up the bits

ok this works but I find the code ugly

@User uploaded a file: Untitled

@User uploaded a file: bandicam 2016-12-17 22-06-09-740.mp4

hmmz it recorded the sound of the series I am watching too 🙂

@ron I see what you mean. Let me take a quick try at writing it differently.

@ron I don't know what the checkbox value should be called, but the point is that you should have a property for it so that the checkbox can bind to that property, and so can all the other values. Then you don't need to disrupt the builder pattern:

@User uploaded a file: Untitled

That looks better to me.

a lot

@ron If you can avoid it, never create references to ui elements. Use a state variable like

checked

here instead. The intent gets much clearer, and the code too.

@ron About the

Accordion.fold

- don't we already have something like that?

It was another good day for TornadoFX today 🙂 We did a lot 🙂

@edvin we have something like that but this version has the expendable boolean as parameter saves a lot if you have several folds

and you only want one to be open at the beginning

Catching up on my open-souce initiatives finally. I didn't get to TornadoFX today but I will tomorrow. But big announcment: RxJavaFX is finally at a 1.0 release. If anybody is using it there are sweeping changes to make way for RxJava 2.0 https://github.com/ReactiveX/RxJavaFX/releases/tag/1.0.0

@ron Can we adapt the current version instead of adding another, or is that what you're doing here? I didn't look at it in detail, but generally we'd like to evolve the current version in a backwards compatible way.