carlw
01/07/2017, 5:28 PMedvin
01/07/2017, 5:29 PMedvin
01/07/2017, 5:30 PMedvin
01/07/2017, 5:30 PMedvin
01/07/2017, 5:32 PMcarlw
01/07/2017, 5:32 PMcarlw
01/07/2017, 5:33 PMedvin
01/07/2017, 5:33 PMrunAsync
has access to Task
in that example.edvin
01/07/2017, 5:34 PMedvin
01/07/2017, 5:35 PMfail
under the loadCustomer
call, the fail
handler would never be registered. So that sucks.edvin
01/07/2017, 5:35 PMedvin
01/07/2017, 5:47 PMedvin
01/07/2017, 5:50 PMrun
is not a reserved word.. hmm... Maybe we can evolve this thing without breaking backwards compatibility...edvin
01/07/2017, 5:50 PMedvin
01/07/2017, 5:53 PMasync
was reserved, but it's not it seems.. Gotta double check that.edvin
01/07/2017, 5:53 PMedvin
01/07/2017, 5:54 PMedvin
01/07/2017, 5:57 PMrun
is taken by stdlib.permalmberg
01/07/2017, 6:00 PMexecute
?edvin
01/07/2017, 6:03 PMedvin
01/07/2017, 6:03 PMpermalmberg
01/07/2017, 6:05 PMedvin
01/07/2017, 6:07 PMedvin
01/07/2017, 6:17 PMpermalmberg
01/07/2017, 6:17 PMpermalmberg
01/07/2017, 6:22 PMedvin
01/07/2017, 6:43 PMedvin
01/07/2017, 6:44 PMthis
inside runAsync
is to remove the type from Task. That shouldn't be a big issue though. Testing now.permalmberg
01/07/2017, 6:48 PM