@User uploaded a file: Untitled and commented: feast your eyes on this gem

I hate that kind of code. Some times it's hard to avoid, but that hard coded path really sucks.

@User uploaded a file: Untitled

cleaned up a bit

That helps 🙂

Instead of

setInScope(injectable, scope)

you can now do

scope.set(injectable)

, directly on your scope instance.

Two very handy helpers for TableView:

- TableView.regainFocusAfterEdit() - make sure TableView doesn't look focus after cell edit - TableColumn.makeEditable(converter) - supply specific converter

hmmz wrong keyboard

Haha 🙂

anyway I was looking at your tableview with property

but when you set the items to for example a SortedFilteredList not the same?

the list changes without problems?

As long as you set items to a property of type list, even the SortedFilteredList will work.

When I think about it, it might require one small change.

@User uploaded a file: Untitled

like this

allentries is a SortedFilteredList

lateinit var allentries: SortedFilteredList<Entry>

allentries must be

Property<SortedFilteredList<Entry>>

The point is that the value of the property can change. This is supported by JavaFX by binding to the itemsProperty of the TableView instead of assigning to the items var.

I wish we had something like that in TreeView

instead of calling populate again

We'll fix that 🙂

the new Jackson is powerfull btw

with the java8 ParameterNamesModule you dont have to annotate a class at all to serialize or deserialize it

But it doesn't support JavaFX properties I guess.

Anybody working with Spek for unit tests here?

No, not yet. Heard it was fantastic though.

plugin looks good...was wondering about a good CI setup that would still work with the plugin