no I need to reverse engineer a piece of .net

the protocol that is used by the browser plugin is not documented

so I have to read the code and find this <censored/> way that it is setup

resharper's not an option?

I was thinking of rider

that's what i was thinking of. i recalled resharper supporting cross-platform

@edvin - is commit on focus lost when editing a tableview still on your radar or should we create an issue to track it?

@gtnarg An issue would be good so I don't forget :) It wasn't trivial, haven't figured out a good way to do it yet.

@edvin - didn't think it would be 🙂 I will create an issue - I think it's a valuable feature for editable tables

@gtnarg I agree, the default behavior is not what people expect, that's for sure :)

I have a wired problem. I have a model and a ItemViewModel

java 
class Model() {
// -- Toolbar
    val expandLevelProperty = SimpleIntegerProperty()
    var expandLevel : Int by expandLevelProperty
}
class ViewModel : ItemViewModel<Model>() {
// Throws the exception!!
 val expandLevel : IntegerProperty = bind { item?.expandLevelProperty }
}

when I start my app I get an

java.lang.ClassCastException: javafx.beans.property.SimpleObjectProperty cannot be cast to javafx.beans.property.IntegerProperty

. Is that a bug or em I am doing something wrong again?

I don't think you have to do the : IntegerProperty in your model

@ron Agree....

I do if I don't want to cast it in my View and just want to call something like

model.expandLevel.isEaualTo(0)

see https://kotlinlang.slack.com/archives/tornadofx/p1488816374011647

@User uploaded a file: Untitled

here is a model I use a lot

Mhm oky, so your case the Entry object has normal kotlin properties?

actually Entry is a ordinary java pojo

Heads up: I've been doing pair programming today and probably will be for the rest of the week. I'll have less time to play here, since I've got another guy looking over my shoulder the whole day 🙂

@nimakro That code should actually work like you have written it, I believe this is a bug. Will look into it asap.

@nimakro It happens because at the time of the call to

bind

, there is nothing in your

item

, so the best the ViewModel can do is to create an

ObjectProperty

. If you initialize the ViewModel with an item at once, it will work. This would be OK:

@User uploaded a file: Untitled

I'm going to investigate better support for specific types here, will try to take a look at it tonight, gotta run now 🙂

@edvin thanks for your explanation, it will do for now.

@nimakro If you have time, can you test your property code against 1.7.1-SNAPSHOT? I just committed a fix.

@edvin oky will do asp..

@ron are you planing on releasing keepassfx to the public any time soon.. I would love to see how some of you more experienced guys use tornadofx in a bigger application

@nimakro If you're coming from a Java background like me, you might find this screencast that @edvin did of interest. He reviews some working code of mine for style points, removing a lot of my Java biases. Let me know if you find this format useful. We might be able to do another one soon. I have some production ideas that might make this even more engaging.

Oh I don't know still some work to be done