take the pok3r as example cheapest I can find is still around 120-130 euro but am I going to be able to actually work on it? I have a stack of keyboards already and my darling wife has this "look" when I tell her I ordered another one

If you don't use the number pad, I would guess you could, but you'll be less productive for some time. If you work on a laptop a lot, it might not be a good idea to switch, because it messes with the mind to go back and forth. Carl is used to it, so he doesn't have a problem, but for us mere mortals it will take time to get used to switching layouts.

One reason I am looking at the pok3r is easy to take with you

Yeah. And it looks incredible.

Just white PBT keycaps looks fantastic, but the custom ones I have on this one is a work of art.

Boris Yartsev [1:08 PM] Hello! I’m playing with tornadofx. I got the config for table view - in this case everything is ok column(”BUILDING", Room::building) column("ROOM", Room::name) But when i try to do something like that - column(”BUILDING", Room::building.name) column("ROOM", Room::name) I get type inference failed. Not enough information to infer parameter T. Why can’t kotlin infer that the parameter is String?

@borboss We might be able to support that syntax actually, but right now you'd have to do:

column("Building", String::class) { value { it.building.select(Building::name) }

or something similar. Checking now.

@borboss For my example above to work

Room::building

must be a

Property<Building>

Can you post the data model for

Room

and

Building

?

assuming its a pojo @borboss I use:

@User uploaded a file: Untitled

ata class Room( val building: Building, val name: String): FuncI

data class Building ( val name: String) : FuncI {

That won't work for him, because

name

is a property on

Building

Yeah it’s POJO

OK, hang on.

@borboss I just want to mention that if Building has a

toString()

that just returns the name, you can do it like this:

@User uploaded a file: Untitled

column<Room, String>(”ROOM", Room::building.name) worked!

Sweet 🙂

Thanks!

we solve everything 🎉

Hey guys, btw, do you know this example - https://github.com/thomasnield/rxkotlinfx-tornadofx-demo

?

It's annoying that you have to provide the types, we'll try to avoid that in 2.0

yes 🙂

there is SalesPerson class https://github.com/thomasnield/rxkotlinfx-tornadofx-demo/blob/master/src/main/kotlin/domain/SalesPerson.kt

To my mind it looks terrible with all that bindings ;-( really had a hard time understanding it. Is it really not a very good example?

I’ts not actually about tornadofx, but still 😉

I agree, this doesn't look pleasing to me either 🙂