Swipeable users we re working on bringing Swipeable into Fou

Question

Swipeable users we re working on bringing Swipeable into Foundation We have an API to configure the anchors based on the layout size and are looking for names More in thread thread

jossiwolf · Answer

Here is the API tentatively named `Modifier swipeAnchors` We are also considering renaming Swipeable to AnchoredDraggable We brainstormed some options but are also open to other ideas one `Modifier dragAnchors` two `Modifier configureAnchors` three `Modifier layoutAnchors` four `Modifier draggableTargets` five `Modifier withSwipeAnchors` six Other please comment

gsala · Answer

The function signature doesn t have the `possibleValues` parameter from the KDoc

jossiwolf · Answer

Good catch this is the correct one slightly smiling face

Stylianos Gakis · Answer

I find the verb options quite confusing as it hints to something being done at that moment Reading `swipeAnchors` makes it sound like you re actually swiping something smile

Stylianos Gakis · Answer

I just saw <https twitter com arkann1985 status 1641379268495040514 s=20|the twitter discussion> and I think the `withSwipeAnchors` feels like the best of all cases It preserves the `swipe` name in there indicating that it s linked with the `SwipeableState` and should be used along with it Which `layoutAnchors` and the other options don t indicate It is not a verb which would make it look like you are actively swiping some anchors Something which is not happening here as this just setting the anchors themselves `withSwipeAnchors` is pretty good at showing that imo Just my 2c blush

Pablichjenkov · Answer

There is a slight difference between swiping and dragging Dragging should take no action after the finger mouse is UP Swiping implies some animation after the finger UP event based on the velocity of the touches I am inclined for any names that contain swipe instead of drag because it is closer to what it does

eygraber · Answer

I agree about not using a verb but I don t think `with ` fits in with most other modifiers I was thinking something like `swipeableAnchors` or `draggableAnchors`

mgrazianodecastro · Answer

`swipeableAnchors` feels good

Joel Denke · Answer

Oh sweet swipeAnchor I think make most sense Very keen start doing my own bottomsheet implementation Is the intention open up all current hidden swipeable state holders and such as well I am missing InteractionSource and gestureEnabled controlling Like disable bottomsheet while other interaction happening on screen Looking forward do custom scrim surface and custom swipe animation with offset progress

eddie · Answer

I think `swipeAnchors` works just fine Like many words in English swipe isn t just a verb but it can also be a noun and in either case here the more grammatically relevant aspect is that it serves to modify anchors You could spend a long time trying to find an unambiguous alternative For instance you could call it `gravityWells` because gravity is virtually always a noun and whether you re swiping or dragging the physical effect is the same but then you ll still have people pointing out that wells can also be a verb And as if to prove my point this message is already long enough `swipeAnchors` is short and sweet while in this case still accurately conveying what is being contributed