A question I had regarding how navigation and back...
# confetti
s
A question I had regarding how navigation and backstacks are handled. Right now, each navigation even is added on top of the backstack. Even if you are switching tabs at the bottom, picking a conference and so on. NiA for example uses the concept of each bottom nav (or navrail) destination being a “top level” destination, and it by itself can keep its own backstack inside of it. Is this something that we’d optimally want Confetti to do as well, or does this work like this on purpose? If we want it to be like in NiA, maybe I can take a look at how that’d work. Attaching a video for each to try and show what I mean.
nia_backstacks.mp4,backstack_handling.mp4
j
I don't think there was any conscious decision to do it that way in Confetti and what you describe re. NiA seems to make more sense.
s
Okay, I’ll open an issue then. And I’ll try to look into it a bit, I’ve been meaning to learn more about how to do this, so it’s a good opportunity