If I have the following function: ```inline fun &...

# detekt

[eygraber]

If I have the following function:

inline fun <T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, R> combine(
  flow: Flow<T1>,
  flow2: Flow<T2>,
  flow3: Flow<T3>,
  flow4: Flow<T4>,
  flow5: Flow<T5>,
  flow6: Flow<T6>,
  crossinline transform: suspend (T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6) -> R
): Flow<R> = kotlinx.coroutines.flow.combine(flow, flow2, flow3, flow4, flow5, flow6) { args: Array<*> ->
  transform(
    args[0] as T1,
    args[1] as T2,
    args[2] as T3,
    args[3] as T4,
    args[4] as T5,
    args[5] as T6
  )
}

It violates CastNullableToNonNullableType , but the generic parameters here could be nullable (and in fact I think they are because they're not * & Any). Am I missing something here?

[Brais Gabin]

This seems like a false positive indeed. T1 could be a nullable type. So we shouldn't say anything about that casting. It should only raise an issue if T1 is defined as T1 : Any.

[Atul Gupta]

Hi @eygraber can you create a bug with minimal reproducing code?

[eygraber]

Sure, I'll do that now

[eygraber]

https://github.com/detekt/detekt/issues/6070

[Atul Gupta]

@eygraber you really had very complex project setup and you keep detekt on its edge 🫡

[eygraber]

A blessing and a curse. Sometimes we can't repro out of the project and we can't share the project 😬