I need to create two versions of a function, a suspendable one and a non-suspendable one, I want to make it explicit in the name which one is or isn't suspendable. What you would be a good antonym of "suspendable"? I could write

mySuspendableFunction

but what would be the name of the other function?

myNonSuspendableFunction

seems a bit too verbose. Or maybe should I go with

myAsyncFunction

and

mySyncFunction

? But those `async`/`sync` words are never used in Kotlin's terminology.

Blocking

is the convention for a non-suspending variation of a function. Usually, we also just name the suspending function without highlighting that it is suspending, because the type system takes care of that

what would you do in case of invocable classes? The type system doesn't help here:

class BlockingClass {
    operator fun invoke(): Unit = TODO()
}

class SuspendableClass {
    suspend operator fun invoke(): Unit = TODO()
}

I would call it

Class

and

BlockingClass

,

thank you !

A minor addendum to what @Youssef Shoaib [MOD] said, I like their suggestion, assuming the suspending version is meant to be the most used / default implementation. If it's the other way around, I'd call the first

Class

and the second something like

AsyncClass

or whatever that demonstrates how it's intended use deviates from the default mode.