Recently I saw JS-like syntax of anonymous functio...

# random

[miha-x64]

Recently I saw JS-like syntax of anonymous functions:

val func = fun(a: Int): Int { return 10 * a }

Now I wonder: ordinary member or top-level function can be described as `fun`; anonymous function, the implementation of functional type, may be described either as lambda-expression or as `fun`*.
Is there any way to describe a member-function as lambda-expression, for consistency?

* actually, also as class or reference (::), but it’s not what I’m talking about