<@U0B8ZP13Q>: Yes, that's because it doesn't allow...
# randomd
debug
08/08/2016, 3:29 PM@cedric: Yes, that's because it doesn't allow any side-effects and such and uses monads and whatnot to get around that problem. I've been reading upon that it is possible to do useful stuff with pure functions that is commonly believed to be useless. Haskell seems to get this done with some special interpreter, this is the part where I get a bit skeptical. Monad transformers might be too once I get to that part. Opinions are subject to change. I did mean seriously that previous statement, not sure about the reaction on that. >_>
But yeah, I'm learning stuff, breaking things and being proven wrong seems to be one of the effective approaches. I am very fond of the pointfree style and the level of genericness that is achievable though.