vmironov
10/15/2016, 10:20 PMprivate data class Foo(
val foo: String = "",
val bar: String = ""
)
data class Bar(
val foo: String = "",
val bar: String = ""
)
Is there any particular reason why kotlinc doesn't generate a no-args constructor for private classes like Foo, but still generates it for public classes like Bar? Both classes are going to be instantiated via reflection using the default constructor, so I want it to be there. It's really weird that the presence of such constuctor is determined by the class visibility.
Basically, I have two options here:
1. Declare clasess as public and leak some implementation details.
2. Mark the constuctor with @JvmOverloads and get a few more useless constructors.
But what I really want is kotlinc to always generate a no-args constructor.