If the annotation targets fields, then I assume it...
# getting-started
o
If the annotation targets fields, then I assume it also injects values directly into the fields - i.e not calling setters. If that is the case then the save method won't be called, because the setter won't be called. But my assumption may be wrong, and the library may try to lookup setters based on the name and type of the field. In which case I think it is appropriate that the library also have a similar annotation for setters. Does it?